Бесплатный фрагмент - Modern market economy and negative consequences of its application

Dear reader, in this book I bring to your attention four of my monographs, the first of which is devoted to the creation of a technology of cognition (research) of socio-economic objects, processes and factors, the second monograph is devoted to a critical analysis of economic theory called «Economics», the third monograph is devoted to a critical analysis of modern, market economy and social sphere, and the fourth monograph is devoted to the creation of a positive state and its economy and social sphere.

Technology of cognition (research) of socio-economic objects, processes and factors.

1. This monograph is devoted to the creation and application of a unique, dialectical technology of cognition (research) of the socio-economic activity of humanity (abbreviated as «PTCH»). The use this technology of cognition makes it possible to accurately determine which currently used socio-economic objects, processes and factors are allowed to be used in the economy and social sphere of a modern state, and which ones are socio-economic objects, processes and factors are strictly forbidden to be applied in the economy and social sphere of a modern state. The use of the «PTCH» cognition technology allows us to really, and not in words, eliminate poverty, hunger, unemployment, crime, terrorism, fascism, stop the inevitable destruction of the negative, market economy and social sphere in all modern states, stop wars between modern, negative states, prevent a global socio-economic catastrophe and a third world, nuclear a war between modern states for profit in the global market of raw materials, goods and services.

2. The purpose of creating this technology, as well as all my other research works in the field of economics, is to use the semantic content of this technology to influence the consciousness of people and thus try to stop the use of socio-economic chaos called «Negative, unfair, criminal, thievish, market economy», the use of which inevitably leads to a global, socio-economic catastrophe and to the third world, nuclear war, which is the end of a continuous, global, brutal, socio-economic war for profit between modern, negative states in the global market of raw materials, goods and services.

The semantic content of these monograph is written clearly and simply and may be of interest to all people who are interested in the problems of modern economics. Dear reader, please forgive me for my imperfect translation of this monograph from Russian to English.

V. Alekseev

From the author.

1. At present, modern people do not have an intelligent technology consisting of intelligent tools and methods of cognition, with the help of which it is possible to accurately determine which socio-economic objects (including people and communities, i.e. enterprises, organizations), processes and factors (including intellectual tools of cognition) are harmful (useless) for the economy and social sphere of a modern state. The purpose of this research is to create an intelligent technology of cognition (research), that is, to create intelligent tools and methods of cognition (research), the use of which will allow anyone to accurately determine what socio-economic objects (including people and communities, i.e. enterprises, organizations), processes and factors (including intellectual tools of cognition), which are useful, and which are harmful for the economy and social sphere of a modern state.

2. As always, the main goal that I pursue in carrying out my research in the field of economics and publishing them in the form of monographs is to try to stop the commission of socio-economic crimes by modern people, as well as to try to stop the consequences of the commission of socio-economic crimes, namely: to stop the continuous, global, socio-economic a war for profit, with the use of weapons and the army, between negative, modern states in the global market, raw materials, goods and services, since the continuation of this continuous, socio-economic war for profit inevitably leads to a global, socio-economic catastrophe and the death of modern humanity.

3. The semantic content of this research paper is written clearly and simply and is accessible to any reader, regardless of their age and level of education. Perhaps after reading the contents of this monograph, as well as the content of my other studies in the field of economics, the reader will question the need to apply a modern, unfair, criminal, thievish, market economy, which in fact is the socio-economic chaos, the use of which inevitably leads to the destruction of modern humanity.

V. Alekseev

1. Objects of this research work.

The objects of this research work are civil and military, socio-economic activities of modern people, which consists in creating and applying socio- economic objects, processes and factors, and therefore the objects of this research work are socio-economic objects, processes and factors.

2. The purpose of this research paper.

The purpose of this research work is to create intellectual tools and methods of positive, dialectical technology of cognition (research) of the socio — economic activity of humanity «PTCH» or, which is the same thing, to create intellectual tools and methods of positive technology of cognition (research) of socio-economic objects, processes and factors, the use of which will allow any person to accurately determine, which socio-economic objects (including people and communities, i.e. enterprises, organizations), processes and factors (including intellectual tools of cognition) are useful, and which are harmful for the economy and social sphere of a modern state.

Remark. To study the socio-economic objects, processes and factors created and applied by modern people in the economy and social sphere means to accurately establish their socio-economic, qualitative and quantitative characteristics and, based on knowledge of these socio-economic, qualitative and quantitative characteristics, to accurately determine which socio-economic objects, processes and factors are allowed to be applied in the economy and social sphere of a modern state, and which ones are strictly prohibited to apply in the economy and social sphere of a modern state. Thus, the positive, dialectical technology of cognition (research) of socio-economic objects, processes and factors «PTCH» is a vital socio-economic filter that the government of any modern state is obliged to apply if it is interested in creating and applying an effective economy and social sphere and if it is not interested in destroying its economy and social sphere. The need for mandatory application of this socio-economic filter should be reflected in the content of the constitution of any modern state. The sooner the citizens who exist in modern states understand this, the better it will be for them, since the application of this socio-economic filter will dramatically increase the standard of living of all, without exception, citizens of a modern state, and not a limited number of people, as is currently the case. In this research paper, I study only socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes and factors that are used in the economy and social sphere of a modern state. Socio-economic, quantitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, that are used in the economy and social sphere of the modern state I will explore in my other monograph. I finish my comment.

3. Intellectual tools used in this research work.

The intellectual tools that I always use in my research work are positive dialectical terms, proposals, postulates (statements, laws), and theories that I create on my own.

4.Introduction

1. All citizens of modern state strive to achieve their main socio-economic purposes. The main socio-economic purposes of the citizens of modern states are the creation and continuous accumulation of socio-economic capital and their transformation into people of socio-economic parasites.

Remark. You, the reader, will find out who the socio-economic parasites are later, from the contents of this monograph. I finish my comment.

2. Striving to achieve their main, socio-economic purposes, the citizens of the modern state consciously, purposefully and systematically create and apply theoretical and practical tools with which they expect to achieve their main, socio-economic purposes.

3. The theoretical tools with which the citizens of a modern state expect to achieve their main socio-economic purposes are many different economic and social theories, including those called: «The theory of supply and demand», «The theory of money», «The Theory of profit»,» The theory of the free market», " Theory of continuous growth of the economy of the state», «Political economy», «Economics», «People’s economy», «Libertarian economy», " Mixed economy (public-private partnership)», «Behavioral economy», «Social economy», «Socialist economy», «Communist economy» and so on, and also, the constitution of the state and legal laws created by the state parliament.

4. Practical tools with which citizens of a modern state expect to achieve their main, socio-economic purposes are a variety of socio-economic objects, processes and factors created and applied by people, including those called: market economy and the social sphere of a modern state, economic tools called: «Сost of socio-economic capital (in the form of human labor, raw materials, goods and services)», units of measurement magnitude of the cost of socio-economic capital called» Money», including electronic money and cryptocurrency; the state parliament, the government of state, the president and his administration, and other tools for managing the economy and social sphere of the modern state, including the army, police, prosecutor’s office, courts, as well as various enterprises and organizations, including financial, insurance, joint-stock, as well as commodity and stock exchanges, stocks, bonds, and so on.

5. Since all citizens of a modern state are interested in achieving their main, socio-economic purposes, they inevitably have to ask themselves the following question: are the theoretical and practical tools created and used by people to achieve the main, socio-economic purposes“ useful „or «harmful»? That guarantees or does not guarantee the creation and application of the above-mentioned theoretical and practical tools for the implementation of their main socio-economic purposes. Therefore, the citizens of a modern state should ask themselves the second question, namely: with the help of what theoretical tools (criteria) it is possible to accurately determine whether the theoretical and practical tools created and used by people to achieve the main socio-economic purposes are «useful» or «harmful». I can answer this question as follows, namely: at present, the citizens of a modern state do not have any theoretical tools (criteria) that can be used to accurately determine whether the theoretical and practical tools created and applied by people to achieve the main purposes are «useful» or «harmful».

6. Since at present the citizens of the modern state do not have any theoretical tools (criteria) with the help of which it is possible to accurately determine whether the theoretical and practical tools created and applied by people for achieving the main socio-economic purposes are «useful» or «harmful», I set myself the task of using dialectical tools to create theoretical tools (criteria) that can be used to accurately determine whether the theoretical and practical tools created and used by people to achieve the main socio-economic purposes are «useful» or «harmful». The process of applying these theoretical tools (criteria), I called the method of critical dialectical analysis (abbreviated as «MCDA»). I have called the combination of theoretical tools (criteria) and the MCDA method the dialectical technology of cognition of socio-economic objects, processes and factors, or, which is the same thing, the positive dialectical technology of cognition of the socio-economic activity of humanity (abbreviated as «PTCH»). Why this dialectical technology of cognition is called positive, you, the reader, will find out later.

7. I’m starting to create this technology.

Positive, dialectical technology of cognition of socio-economic objects, processes and factors «PTCH».

1. In order to determine exactly which socio-economic objects, processes and factors, including (intellectual tools of cognition), created and applied by socio-economic people in the modern economy and social sphere, are useful and which are harmful, I must establish which socio-economic qualitative characteristics should posses socio-economic objects, processes, and factors, including (intellectual tools of cognition), created and used by socio-economic people. Since at present people have not created the socio-economic, qualitative characteristics that socio-economic objects, processes and factors used in the modern economy and social sphere should have, I must create these socio-economic, qualitative characteristics myself.

2. The socio-economic characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes, and factors that I create must meet strictly defined socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions). Since people have not yet created socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions) that the socio-economic qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes, and factors must meet, I must create these socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions) myself. Then, I have to create a method for researching the socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes, and factors that are used in the modern economy and social sphere. This means that I must create a process in which, by applying the socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions) that I have created, I can accurately determine the specific socio-economic and qualitative characteristics of the socio-economic objects, processes, and factors used in the modern economy and social sphere.

2. I will start performing these three tasks.

2.1. In order to accurately distinguish between all socio-economic objects, processes and factors created and applied in the modern economy and social sphere, I must create their socio-economic, qualitative characteristics.

2.2. In order to create the socio-economic, qualitative characteristics that socio-economic objects processes and factors created and applied in the modern economy and social sphere should have, I divided them into two main groups, one of which I called positive, socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects processes I named the other group of characteristics as negative, socio-economic qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes, and factors. In this way, I have created two main socio-economic qualitative characteristics, using which it is possible to distinguish between all socio-economic objects, processes and factors created and applied in the modern economy and social sphere.

2.3. While studying socio-economic characteristics, I have established that positive, socio-economic qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes, and factors should be scientifically organized, scientifically based, scientifically necessary, socio-economic qualitative characteristics. Then I established that negative, socio-economic qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes, and factors should be not scientifically organized, not scientifically based, not scientifically necessary, and socio-economic qualitative characteristics. Thus, I have created six auxiliary, socio-economic qualitative characteristics that can be used to distinguish between all socio-economic objects, processes, and factors created and applied in the modern economy and social sphere.

2.4. Then I determined what socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions) should be met by socio-economic objects, processes, and factors in order to have strictly defined, auxiliary, socio-economic qualitative characteristics.

1. A socio-economic object, process and factor has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called» scientifically organized» if it meets the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: the socio-economic object, process and factor was created using positive, theoretical and practical tools and methods of cognition of the positive dialectical technology of cognition «PTCH», including with the help of the positive «Socio-economic theory No. 1».

2. A socio-economic object, process and factor has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called» not scientific organized» if it meets the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: the socio-economic object, process and factor was created with the help of negative, theoretical and practical tools and methods of cognition of the negative, dialectical technology of cognition «NTCH», including with the help of negative, economic theory called «Economics» or any other negative, economic theory.

Remark №2.

Currently, the positive, dialectical technology of cognition (research) «PTCH», which includes «Socio-economic Theory No. 1» and my other research works in the field of economics, belongs to the positive, intellectual tools for cognition of socio-economic objects, processes and factors. Unfortunately, I must state that all economic and social theories created and applied at the present time, without exception, are negative, that is, not scientifically organized, not scientifically based, not scientifically necessary, intellectual tools for understanding the socio-economic activity of humanity, that is, they are at best intellectual mistake, bat in the worst case, they are theoretical tools for deceiving the citizens of modern states, as well as theoretical tools for propaganda of a negative, criminal, thievish, market economy (an economy of socio-economic chaos) in which «Not equivalent, not fair, thievish processes of exchanging socio-economic capital» are used. I finish my comment and continue creating socio-economic criteria.

Before continuing my research, I need to explain what socio-economic objects, processes, and factors are, since the creation of strictly defined socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions) depends on this.

1. A socio-economic objects include a socio-economic person, as well as communities of socio-economic people, i.e. enterprises, organizations, and states.

2. A socio-economic objects also include socio-economic capital that people create and possess, including material and (in the form of human labor, raw materials, goods and services) and intellectual. Goods include not only companies, but also securities, including shares, bonds, and patents.

3. A socio-economic objects called a socio-economic person or a community of socio-economic people has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «scientifically based» if the person or community of people meets the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely:

1. A person or community of people strives to achieve the main, positive, socio-economic purposes, using positive, theoretical and practical tools and methods to achieve the goal, including using positive, fair, socio-economic processes called «Equivalent processes of exchange of socio-economic capital».

2. A person or community creates and has positive, socio-economic capital.

3. A person or community is cultured, enlightened, moral, spiritual.

Remark.

1. A cultured person is a person who consciously and purposefully strives for continuous physical, intellectual, moral and spiritual self-improvement, from the moment of his birth to the moment of his death. The same applies to a community of cultured people.

2. An enlightened person is a person who has, among other things, knowledge of positive cognition technology «PTCH», including positive Socio-economic theory No. 1 and applies this knowledge in their socio-economic activities.

3. A moral person is a person who does not commit crimes, including not committing socio-economic crimes, and does not allow other people to commit crimes, including socio-economic ones. 4. Spiritual is a just, honest, sincere, kind, unselfish person.

4. A socio-economic objects called a socio-economic person or a community of socio-economic people has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «not scientifically based» if:

1. A person or community of people meets the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: a person or community of people strives to achieve the main, negative, socio-economic purposes, using negative, theoretical and practical tools and methods to achieve the goal, including negative, unfair, thievish ones, socio-economic processes called «Non-equivalent processes of exchange of socio-economic capital». :

2. A person or community of people strives to turn into people of socio-economic parasites.

3. A person or community of people creates and possesses negative, socio-economic capital.

4. A person or community of people is not cultured, not enlightened, immoral, spiritless.

Remark.

Unfortunately, all modern people have an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «not scientifically based», so they meet the following socio-economic criteria, namely: modern people are not cultural, not enlightened, immoral, unspiritual.

1. Modern people are not cultured because they do not strive for continuous physical, intellectual, moral and spiritual self-improvement, from the moment of their birth to the moment of their death.

2. Modern people are not enlightened, because they do not have knowledge of the positive technology of cognition «PTCH», including the positive «Socio-economic Theory No. 1» and do not apply this knowledge in their socio-economic activities.

3. Modern people are immoral because they either commit socio-economic and war crimes themselves, or allow other people to commit socio-economic and war crimes.

4. Modern people are spiritless, because in order to make a profit, committing socio-economic crimes for this purpose, they go to deception, hypocrisy, threats and direct violence against other people.

5. Modern people are not fair, honest, sincere, kind, unselfish people. They are greedy hypocritical vile not sincere not fair not honest people.

6. Modern people, using any processes, including deception, hypocrisy, misinformation, provocation, abduction, violence and murder of other people, tend to turn into people of socio-economic parasites, and then into people of super socio-economic parasites.

7. Modern people consciously, purposefully and systematically create and apply negative, criminal, thieving, socio-economic objects, processes and factors, including the socio-economic process called «Continuous, global, socio-economic war for profit, with the use of the weapons and armies, between modern, negative states in the global market of raw materials, goods and services.»

Remark №1. Looking ahead, I will say that at present all people and all states are not scientifically organized, not scientifically based, not scientifically necessary, that is, they are negative. I finish my comment.

Remark №2.

A socio-economic object is scientifically based if its socio-economic qualitative and quantitative characteristics meet the positive socio-economic criteria of positive technology «PTCH». Socio-economic object is not scientifically based if its socio-economic qualitative and quantitative characteristics do not meet the positive socio-economic criteria of positive technology «PTCH». I finish my comment.

5. A socio-economic objects called socio-economic capital (in the form of human labor, raw materials, goods, services) has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «scientifically based» if it meets the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely:

1. The magnitude of socio-economic capital (in the form of human labor raw materials, goods, services) is measured accurately using positive, economic instruments called: quantitative characteristics of socio-economic capital called: the time spent by a person to create socio-economic capital (abbreviated «TS»), as well as units of measurement of the magnitude «TS» under the name: hour, minute, second.

2. A socio-economic capital is created as a result of the application of a positive, fair, socio-economic process called «Equivalent process of exchange of socio-economic capital».

6. A socio-economic objects called socio-economic capital (in the form of human labor, raw materials, goods, services) has an auxiliary, socio-economic qualitative characteristic called «not scientifically based» if it meets the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely:

1. The magnitude of socio-economic capital (in the form of human labor, goods, raw materials, and services) is measured arbitrarily using negative, economic instruments called: Cost of socio-economic capital, as well as units of measurement of the magnitude Cost called «Money», including digital money and cryptocurrency.

2.A socio- economic capital is created as a result of the application of a negative, unfair, criminal, thievish, socio-economic process called «Non-equivalent process of exchange of socio-economic capital», that is, socio-economic capital is created as a result of the commission of a socio-economic crime.

7. Before I create socio-economic criteria for socio-economic processes, I should tell you a little about them.

The fundamental, negative, unfair, criminal, thievish, socio-economic process that is currently created and applied by people in the economy and social sphere of a modern state is the socio-economic process called «Non-equivalent process of exchanging socio-economic capital (in the form of human labor, raw materials, goods and services)». This process is a socio-economic crime against a socio-economic person and communities of socio-economic people. All other negative, socio-economic processes currently used by people in the economy and social sphere of the modern state are a consequence of the creation of the above-mentioned fundamental, negative, socio-economic process. Here are some of them:

1. The process called «Creation of socio-economic capital called «profit» in people of socio-economic parasites, by creating an equal amount of socio-economic capital called «losses» in people of socio-economic donors and turning them into people of socio-economic PDSC.

2. A process called «A continuous, socio-economic war for profit between people who are socio-economic parasites, donors and PDSC within the modern state».

3. A process called «A continuous, global, socio-economic war for profit, including with the use of the army and weapons, between modern, negative states, socio-economic parasites, donors and PDSC in the global market of raw materials, goods and services».

4. The process called «Continuous increase in the magnitude of socio-economic capital and its concentration in the personal property of a limited number of people of socio-economic super socio-economic parasites, due to the continuous reduction to zero of the magnitude of socio-economic capital of all other citizens of a modern, negative state and their transformation into people of socio-economic PDSC».

5. The process called «The creation and inevitable destruction of a negative, criminal, thievish, market economy in all modern, negative states and, as a consequence, the inevitable destruction of all modern, negative states».

Remark.

Who are the socio-economic parasites, donors, and PDSC people?

1. Socio-economic parasites are people who commit social and economic crimes against the citizens of a modern, negative state. These people continuously steal socio-economic capital from other people, using a negative, unfair, criminal, socio-economic process called «Non-equivalent process of exchanging socio-economic capital».

2. People who are socio-economic donors and PDSC are victims of socio-economic crimes. These are people whose socio-economic capital is constantly stolen by socio-economic parasites, using for this purpose a negative, unfair, criminal, socio-economic process called «Non-equivalent process of exchanging socio-economic capital».

3. The difference between people who are socio-economic donors and PDSC is that people who are socio-economic PDSC have their socio-economic capital completely stolen and they are «eternal debtors» to people who are socio-economic parasites (usually loan sharks). In ancient Rome, such a person sold his entire family and then himself into slavery to the usurer for debts. As a result, working all his life for a moneylender, a socio-economic person had no property of his own and possessed only what the moneylender gave him. The moneylender had the full right to use his slave at will, including the right to maim or kill his slave (an eternal debtor). A modern person, a socio-economic PDSC, falling into a debt trap set by a Bank, works all his life without being able to repay his debts. The difference between him and the Roman slave is that he cannot sell himself and his family into slavery for debt, and he cannot be maimed and killed by the owners of the Bank. I finish my comment.

I am starting to create socio-economic criteria for socio-economic processes.

8. A socio-economic process has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «scientifically based» if it meets the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely:

1. In the socio-economic process, positive, economic instruments are used under the name: positive quantitative characteristics of socio-economic capital under the name: time spent by a socio-economic person on creating socio-economic capital (abbreviated as «TS»), as well as units of measurement of the magnitude of «TS» under the name: hour, minute, second.

2. The socio-economic process is «The equivalent process of exchanging socio-economic capital».

9. A socio-economic process has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «not scientifically based» if it meets the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely:

1. In the socio-economic process, negative economic instruments are used called: quantitative characteristic of socio-economic capital called «Cost of socio-economic capital» and units of measurement of magnitude Cost called «Money», including in the form of digital money or in the form of cryptocurrency.

2.The socio-economic process is a «Non-equivalent process for the exchange of socio-economic capital» or it is a consequence of the application of a «Non-equivalent process for the exchange of socio-economic capital».

Remark. As the reader already knows, in a modern, negative state, all the negative, socio-economic processes used are a consequence of the use of «Non-equivalent, processes of exchange of socio-economic capital.» I finish my comment.

Next, I will move on to creating socio-economic criteria for socio-economic factors that are also created and applied by people in the economy and social sphere of a modern state. I will explore only some of the factors applied by people in the economy and social sphere of the modern state, including under the title: main, socio-economic purposes of socio-economic people, as well as intellectual tools that are created and applied by people, including economic and social theories, as well as legal laws of the modern state. This includes the constitution of modern state.

10. A socio-economic factor called the main, socio-economic purposes of a socio-economic person has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «scientifically based» if it meets the following socio — economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: For the implementation of the main, positive socio-economic purposes people apply positive, theoretical and practical tools and methods.

11. A socio-economic factor called the main, socio-economic purposes of a socio-economic person has an auxiliary, socio-economic qualitative characteristic called «not scientifically based» " if it meets the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: For the implementation of the main, negative socio-economic purposes people apply negative, theoretical and practical tools and methods.

12. A socio-economic objects, processes and factors have an auxiliary, socio-economic qualitative characteristic called «scientifically necessary «» if they meet the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: Their application guarantees the implementation of the main, positive, socio-economic purposes, guarantees the creation of a society of cultured people in a modern state, guarantees the creation and application of a positive, just, centralized, planned, democratic, self-sufficient, automated economy and social sphere in a modern state, guarantees the creation of a global community of positive, just, peace-loving states, the creation of which will lead to the cessation of wars and to complete disarmament all states that exist on Earth.

13. Socio-economic objects, processes and factors have an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «not scientifically necessary» " in the event that they meet the following socio — economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: Their application does not guarantee the implementation of the main, positive, socio-economic purposes of humanity, namely: it does not guarantee the creation of a society of cultured people in a modern state, it does not guarantee the creation and application of a positive, just, centralized, planned, democratic, self-sufficient, automated economy and social sphere in a modern state, it does not guarantee the creation of a global community of positive, just, cultural, peace-loving states, the creation of which will lead to the cessation of wars and to the complete disarmament of all states existing on Earth.

Remark.

1. A democratic economy and social sphere is an economy and social sphere that functions in the interests of all citizens of a modern state, without exception, and not in the interests of a limited number of people who are socio-economic parasites, as is currently the case.

2. A self-sufficient economy and social sphere is an economy and social sphere that does not depend on external, socio-economic chaos. I also called it an economy and a social sphere protected from external socio-economic aggression. I finish my comment.

14. As for the study of intellectual tools of cognition (research), there are its own peculiarities, namely: in this case, their semantic content is studied.

I will study the socio-economic factor in detail under the title: legal laws, including the constitution of a modern state, and for this purpose I will create the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions).

1.A socio- economic factor called: legal laws, including the constitution of a modern state, has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «scientifically organized» if it meets the following socio — economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: the semantic content of legal laws, including the constitution of a modern state are created using positive, dialectical terms, proposal, postulates (statements, axioms, laws), and theories of the positive technology of cognition «PTCH».

2.A socio- economic factor called: legal laws, including the constitution of a modern state, has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «not — scientific-organized» if it meets the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: the semantic content of legal laws, including the constitution of a modern state are created using negative, dialectical terms, proposal, postulates (statements, axioms, laws), and theories of the negative technology of cognition «NTCH».

3.A socio-economic factor called: legal laws, including the constitution of a modern state, has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «scientifically based» if it meets the following socio — economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: the semantic content of legal acts, including the constitution of a modern state corresponds (does not contradict) the semantic content of the positive technology of cognition «PTCH», including corresponds (does not contradict) the semantic content of the positive «Socio-economic Theory No. 1», as well as my other positive intellectual tools in the field of economics.

4.A socio-economic factor called: legal laws, including the constitution of a modern state, has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «not scientifically based» if it meets the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: the semantic content of legal acts, including the constitution of a modern state. laws and the constitution of a modern state, does not correspond (contradicts) the semantic content of the positive technology of cognition» PTCH», including does not correspond (contradicts) the semantic content of the positive «Socio-economic Theory No. 1», as well as my other positive intellectual tools in the field of economics.

5.A socio- economic factor called: legal laws, including the constitution of a modern state, has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «scientifically necessary» if it meets the following socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: if the application of the semantic content of legal laws and the constitution of a modern state leads to the creation of a positive semantic content of other intellectual tools of cognition, which ultimately leads to the creation of a positive, that is, a scientifically organized, scientifically based, scientifically necessary, socio-economic worldview in a person.

6.A socio-economic factor called: legal laws, including the constitution of a modern state, has an auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic called «not scientifically necessary» if it meets the following socio — economic criteria (requirements, conditions), namely: the application of a semantic content of legal laws and the constitution of a modern state leads to the creation of negative semantic content of other intellectual tools of cognition, which ultimately leads to the creation of a negative, that is, an not scientifically organized, not scientifically based, not scientifically necessary, socio-economic worldview in a person.

15. Summing up the results of the creation of socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), I can state that I have created socio-economic criteria (requirements, conditions), using which I can accurately establish the auxiliary, socio-economic, qualitative characteristics that socio-economic objects, processes and factors that have been created and applied in the modern economy and social sphere.

Based on the results of this dialectical analysis, I can accurately state the following, namely:

1. Scientifically organized are socio-economic objects, processes and factors created with the help of positive, dialectical tools and methods of positive technology of cognition «PTCH».

2. Not scientifically organized are socio-economic objects, processes and factors created with the help of negative, dialectical tools and methods of negative technology of cognition «NTCH».

3. The socio-economic objects, processes and factors are scientifically based, if the socio-economic qualitative and quantitative characteristics of which correspond (do not contradict) the positive socio-economic criteria of the positive technology of cognition «PTCH», including correspond (do not contradict) the positive, socio-economic criteria of the positive «Socio-economic Theory No. 1».

4.Socio-economic objects, processes, and factors are not scientifically based, if the socio-economic qualitative and quantitative characteristics of which do not meet (contradict) the positive, socio-economic criteria of the positive technology of cognition «PTCH», including do not meet (contradict) the positive, socio-economic criteria of the positive «Socio-economic Theory No. 1».

5. Scientifically necessary are socio-economic objects, processes and factors, the use of which guarantees the implementation of the main, positive, socio-economic purposes that all modern people should strive for, if they do not want the destruction of the economy and social sphere in their state, which is created by people who are socio-economic parasites, if they do not they want to create a global, socio-economic catastrophe, which is created by people who are socio-economic parasites, if they do not want to be «cannon fodder» in the global, nuclear war for profit between modern, negative states, which is also created by people who are socio-economic parasites.

Remark.

The main positive socio-economic purposes that all modern people should strive to achieve are the following purposes: the creation of a society of cultured people, the creation and application of a positive, centralized, planned, fair, democratic, self-sufficient, automated economy and social sphere in all states, the creation of a global community of positive, just, peace-loving states and as a consequence of this fact, the reduction to zero of the size of the army in all states and the destruction of all weapons created by modern, ignorant and immoral people for profit.

6. Not scientifically necessary are socio-economic objects, processes and factors, the use of which does not guarantee the implementation of the main, positive socio-economic purposes, that all modern people should strive for, if they do not want the destruction of the economy and social sphere in their state, which is created by people who are socio-economic parasites, if they do not want to create a global, socio-economic catastrophe, which is created by people who are socio-economic parasites, if they do not want to be «cannon fodder» in the global, nuclear war for profit between modern, negative states, which is also created by people who are socio-economic parasites.

16. Knowledge of the auxiliary, socio-economic qualitative characteristics that socio-economic objects, processes, and factors possess makes it possible to accurately determine whether socio-economic objects, processes, and factors used in the modern economy and social sphere are positive and therefore «useful» for the social sphere economy of a modern state, or they are negative and therefore «harmful» for the economy and social sphere of the modern state.

17. Three positive, socio-economic qualitative characteristics of the studied socio-economic objects of processes and factors under the name: scientifically organized, scientifically based, scientifically necessary, are interrelated. This means that it is enough, using the dialectical method «MCDA» to establish one positive, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic of the studied socio-economic object, process or factor, in order to accurately state that the other two socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of the studied socio-economic object, process or factor are also positive, socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of the studied socio-economic object, process or factor.

18. Three negative, socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of the studied socio-economic objects of processes and factors under the name: not scientifically organized, not scientifically based, not scientifically necessary, are also interrelated. This means that it is enough, using the dialectical method «MCDA» to establish one negative, socio-economic, qualitative characteristic of the studied socio-economic object, process or factor, in order to accurately state that two other socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of the studied socio-economic object, process or factor are also negative, socio-economic qualitative characteristics of the studied socio-economic object, process or factor.

19. The dialectical method «MCDA», which establishes one or two socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of the studied socio-economic object, process or factor, is called the accelerated (simplified) dialectical method «MCDA».

20. The dialectical method «MCDA», which establishes three socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of the studied socio-economic object, process or factor, is called the complete (general) dialectical method «MCDA». Both of these methods can be used.

21. Knowledge of the «useful» and «harmful», socio-economic qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes, and factors used in the modern economy and social sphere makes it possible to make a correct, accurate decision about the permissibility (possibility) of using or not permissibility (not possibility) using of the socio-economic object, process and factor under study in the economy and social sphere of the modern state.

22. I have called the dialectical process, the use of which makes it possible to accurately identify «useful» and «harmful» socio-economic objects, processes and factors used in the modern economy and social sphere, the method of critical, dialectical analysis of socio-economic objects, processes and factors (abbreviated as «MCDA»). The application of the dialectical method and dialectical instruments of analysis of socio — economic objects, processes and factors, I have called the positive, dialectical technology of cognition (research) of socio-economic objects, processes and factors, or, which is the same thing, the positive, dialectical technology of cognition (research) of the socio-economic activity of humanity (abbreviated as «PTCH»).

23. Summing up the results of this study, I can state for sure that I have created a positive technology of cognition «PTCH», which is a «Socio-economic filter» of socio-economic objects, processes and factors, which should be applied by the governments of all modern states if they really want to improve the lives of all, without exception, their citizens and if they do not want the destruction of the economy and social sphere in their state, as well as if they do not want to create a global, socio-economic catastrophe and the death of modern humanity.

Dialectical postulates (statements, laws) of the positive technology «PTCH».

1. Dialectical postulate (Law) No. 1.

Before making a decision on the application of any socio-economic objects, process and factor, including (an intellectual tool of cognition) in the economy and social sphere of a modern state, citizens of a modern state need, using the method of critical dialectical analysis («MCDA»), to accurately determine whether the studied socio-economic objects, processes and factors is useful to the economy and social sphere of a modern state or studied socio-economic objects, processes and factors is harmful to the economy and social sphere of a modern state.

2. Dialectical postulate (Law) No. 2.

In the economy and social sphere of the modern state, only useful, socio-economic objects, processes and factors are allowed to be used, including (intellectual tools of cognition), that is, in the economy and social sphere of the modern state, only socio-economic objects, processes and factors, including (intellectual tools of cognition), which have positive, i.e. scientifically organized, scientifically based, scientifically necessary, socio-economic qualitative characteristics.

3. Dialectical postulate (law) No. 3.

The use of harmful socio-economic objects, processes and factors in the economy and social sphere of the modern state, including (intellectual tools of cognition), that is, the use in the economy and social sphere of the modern state of socio-economic objects, processes and factors that are negative, that is, not scientifically organized, not scientifically based, not-scientifically necessary, socio-economic qualitative characteristics are strictly prohibited, as this leads to the creation of negative, unfair, criminal, thievish, socio-economic processes called «Non-equivalent processes of exchange of socio-economic capital», in which the theft of socio-economic capital from citizens of a modern state. The use of harmful, socio-economic objects, processes and factors in the economy and social sphere of the modern state, including (intellectual tools of cognition), leads to the creation, and then to the inevitable destruction of a negative, unfair, criminal, thievish, market economy and, as a consequence of this negative process, leads to the destruction of the modern state.

4. Dialectical postulate (law) No. 4.

Not knowing or ignoring the semantic content of laws No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 of this technology by modern people leads not only to the destruction of the economy and social sphere in any modern state, but also leads to the creation of a global, socio-economic catastrophe and the death of the modern humanity.

5. Dialectical postulate (law) No. 5.

Before allowing a person to participate (to work) in the economy and social sphere of a modern state, it is necessary to accurately establish their positive or negative socio-economic characteristics, using the dialectical method «MCDA». This means that it is necessary to accurately determine whether the person under study is a socio-economic parasite, donor or PDSC. Since socio-economic parasites are people who constantly commit socio-economic crimes against the citizens of the modern state, namely, theft of socio-economic capital from the citizens of the modern state, for this reason their participation in the economy and social sphere of the modern state is strictly prohibited. Socio-economic activity of people of socio-economic parasites, namely the continuous theft of socio-economic capital from the citizens of a modern state, leads to the inevitable destruction of the economy and social sphere in any modern state.

6. Dialectical postulate (Law) No. 6.

To participate (to work) in the economy and social sphere of a modern state, only socio-economic people who have knowledge of the positive cognition technology «PTCH», including those people who have knowledge of the positive «Socio-economic Theory No. 1», as well as those people who use these intellectual tools in their socio-economic activities. These requirements of the law also apply to all communities of socio-economic people, that is, to enterprises and organizations operating in a modern state.

7. Dialectical postulate (Law) No. 7.

Dialectical technology of cognition «PTCH» is a necessary, theoretical tool of cognition, the use of which really, and not in words, guarantees an increase in the standard of living of all, without exception, citizens of a modern state, and not individual citizens.

An example of the application of positive, dialectical technology of cognition of the socio-economic activity of humanity (PTCH).

1. As the reader already knows, the use of positive technology of cognition under the abbreviated name «PTCH» allows you to accurately identify positive or negative, socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of any socio-economic objects (including socio-economic people and their communities, i.e. enterprises, organizations, states). Knowledge of positive or negative, socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of any socio-economic objects (including socio-economic people and their communities, that is for enterprises, organizations), it allows people to make an accurate decision about the possibility (permissibility) or impossibility (non-permissibility) of using the studied socio-economic objects (including socio-economic people and their communities, i.e., enterprises and organizations) in the economy and social sphere of a modern state.

2. As the reader already knows, in order to accurately determine the socio-economic and qualitative characteristics of any socio-economic objects (including socio-economic people and their communities, i.e. enterprises, organizations, states), as well as any socio-economic processes and factors, I must apply the method of critical, dialectical analysis (MCDA). This means that by applying the positive, dialectical criteria of cognition that I have created, I can accurately determine the socio-economic and qualitative characteristics of the studied socio-economic objects, processes, and factors. In this case, as the object under study, I chose a community of socio-economic people called» Bank «or, which is the same thing,» Usurious Organization».

3. I begin a critical, dialectical analysis of the socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of the community of socio-economic people called «Bank».

3.1. The community of socio-economic people called «Bank» is an not scientific organized community of socio-economic people, since this community is consciously, purposefully created using negative, theoretical and practical, economic tools and methods of negative technology of cognition «NTCH». Negative, theoretical, economic tools of cognition «NTCH» are negative, economic theories, including called «Political economy», «Socialist economy», «Communist economy», «People’s economy», «Social economy», «Behavioral economics», «Economics» and the theories that are its components namely: «The theory of supply and demand», «The theory of money», «The theory of profit», «The theory of continuous growth of the economy of the state» and so on. Negative, practical, economic instruments is: the Cost of socio-economic capital (in the form of human labor, raw materials, goods and services), as well units of measurement of magnitude of the cost called «Money», including electronic money and cryptocurrency. Negative theoretical methods of cognition (research) of socio-economic objects, processes and factors that are used in the negative technology of «NTCH» are methods called: trial and error, the method of mathematical and statistical forecasts, the method of applying socio-economic hypotheses, and so on. In the negative technology of cognition of socio-economic objects, processes and factors «NTCH» does not apply a positive method of research of socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes and factors, including socio-economic people and their communities, i.e. enterprises, organizations, states, and also does not apply a positive method research of socio-economic and qualitative characteristics of intellectual tools for understanding the socio-economic activity of humanity, including under the title dialectical theories. This means that the negative technology of cognition (research) of «NTCH» does not apply the positive method of critical, dialectical analysis of socio-economic objects, processes and factors of «MCDA».

The community of socio-economic people called «Bank» is an not scientific organized community of socio-economic people, since it is deliberately created by people using negative, dialectical methods and tools of the negative technology of cognition «NTCM». In particular, it was created using the following dialectical assumptions (hypotheses), namely:

A) the hypothesis according to which the creation and application of the community of socio-economic people called «Bank» guarantees the continuous development of the economy and social sphere in a modern state.

B) the hypothesis according to which the creation and application of the community of socio-economic people called «Bank» guarantees a continuous increase the «standard of living» for all, without exception, people existing in a modern state.

C) the hypothesis according to which the creation and application of the community of socio-economic people called «Bank» guarantees the absence of negative criminal, thievish, harmful, socio-economic objects, processes and factors, including called: hunger, poverty, unemployment, lack of housing, labor strikes, inflation, crime and so on in the modern state.

3.2. The community of socio-economic people called the «Bank» is not scientifically based community, as its socio-economic quality characteristics do not meet the positive criteria of positive technology cognition «PTCH», including do not meet the positive criteria of positive socio-economic theory No. 1. I will give evidence of the validity of this statement.

The community of socio-economic people called «Bank» is not a scientifically based community of socio-economic people, since it consists of socio-economic people who strive to achieve the main negative, socio-economic purposes using negative, criminal, thievish, theoretical and practical tools and methods, and namely: these people strive for a continuous increase in the value of their socio-economic capital, and they also strive to turn into people of socio-economic parasites, committing socio-economic crimes for this purpose, namely, they carry out continuous theft of socio-economic capital from other citizens using the «Not-equivalent process of exchanging socio-economic capital». As a negative, theoretical tool, with the help of which a community of socio-economic people called“ Bank „commits socio-economic crimes against the citizens of a modern state, this community applies the modern, economic theory called «Economics», the semantic content of which requires the use of negative, economic tools called: the Cost socio-economic capital (in form human labor, raw materials, goods and services) and units of measurement of magnitude of the Cost called «Money», including electronic money and cryptocurrency. The content of the economic theory called «Economics» states that the use of an arbitrary magnitude of Cost socio-economic capital (in form human labor, raw materials, goods, and services) and arbitrary units of measurement for the magnitude of socio-economic capital called «Money,» including electronic money and cryptocurrency, guarantees the creation of an efficient and fair economy, as well as guarantees continuous improvement of the standard of living of all citizens of a modern state. As a negative theoretical method of committing socio-economic crimes, this community of socio-economic people uses a negative, unfair, criminal, thievish method, which I called «Global, financial scam (deception)». By applying these negative, unfair, criminal, theoretical and practical tools and methods, the community called «Bank» makes a profit in the form of real, socio-economic capital, without creating any real, socio-economic capital. This means that the community of socio-economic people called «Bank» is a «financial pump» that continuously siphons real, socio-economic capital from real sectors of the economy and the social sphere, which leads to their inevitable destruction.

3.3. A community of socio-economic people called «Bank» is not scientifically necessary community of socio-economic people, since the socio-economic activity of this community does not guarantee the achievement of the main, positive, socio-economic purposes that all people should strive for, if they do not want to destroy economy and social sphere in state, if they do not want to find themselves in the epicenter of a rapidly approaching global socio-economic catastrophe or turn into «cannon fodder» in a continuous, global socio-economic war for profit, with the use of weapons and the army, between modern, negative states on the global market of raw materials, goods and services.

A community of socio-economic people called «Bank» is not scientifically necessary community of socio-economic people, since the socio-economic activity of this community leads to the inevitable creation and then destruction of a negative, unfair, criminal, thievish, decentralized, not-planned, market economy and social sphere in modern, negative state.

Remark. You, the reader, can be convinced of the validity of these statements if you read the contents of my monograph entitled «Socio-economic Theory No. 1».

4. Summing up the results of a critical, dialectical analysis of the socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of a socio-economic objects called a community of socio-economic people called a «Bank», I can state for sure that this socio-economic object of research is not scientifically organized, not scientifically based, not scientifically necessary, and therefore this socio-economic object of research is negative.

5. Since, as a result of applying a critical, dialectical analysis, I have clearly established that a socio-economic objects, namely a community of socio-economic people called «Bank», has negative, socio-economic, qualitative characteristics, I can accurately state that this community of socio-economic people is a harmful community and therefore, I can definitely say that the use of this community of socio-economic people in the economy and social sphere of a modern state should be prohibited.

6. If this statement is ignored and the socio-economic community of people called «Bank» is applied in the economy and social sphere of a modern state, this will inevitably lead to the destruction of the economy and social sphere in a modern state and, as a consequence of this process, will lead to the destruction of the modern state.

7. There is, however, a simpler, but not scientific method to establish the possibility or not the possibility of applying socio-economic objects and processes in the economy of a modern state. I called this method «Conditions for a successful flight of a spacecraft called „Earth“ in the universe.» I will explain the process of applying this method.

The fact is that the object called «Earth», on the surface of which humanity exists, is actually a spaceship that is rushing at great speed in the energy flow in the Universe. Therefore, I can say for sure that all the inhabitants of «Earth» are members of the crew of a spaceship called «Earth». Now, the reader should ask yourself the following question: in the event that the government of any state decides that it is necessary to send a strictly defined crew on a space flight, is it possible for any member of the government to come up with the crazy, absurd idea of sending a person by profession «moneylender» as a member of the crew of a spacecraft? Any reasonable person can understand that such an idea can only occur to a mad person. Nevertheless, modern economists, as well as members of the government in all modern states, firmly believe that for the successful flight of a spacecraft called «Earth», you need team members by profession «loan sharks». This statement of modern economists, as well as members of the government in all modern states, convincingly proves their complete intellectual ignorance, and also suggests that these people are able to offer and defend crazy, absurd ideas, according to which for the crew of a spaceship called Earth» vital team members with the profession «moneylenders». This statement also proves how immoral modern economists and government members in all modern states are, offering people by profession «moneylenders» to join the crew of the spaceship called «Earth», since the activity of «moneylenders» on board the spacecraft is to commit socio-economic crimes. Ask the reader a second question, namely, what would the crew of any spaceship do if they found a person on board by profession «moneylender». I have no doubt that in this case they will consider this person unnecessary ballast and without any regrets will throw this ballast overboard into outer space. The duty of the crew members of the spacecraft called «Earth» is, among other things, not to take on board the spacecraft the wrong ballast, including the people called «moneylender». Therefore, the task of the government of any modern state is to prevent participation in the economy and social sphere of people in the profession of «moneylender».

Remark. What is a socio-economic crime against the citizens of a modern, negative state, you, the reader, can read in more detail in my monograph entitled «Socio-economic theory No. 1». I finish my comment.

Conclusion.

1.Since now, as a reader, you have knowledge of the positive technology of «PTCH», you can independently, using this technology, determine exactly which socio-economic objects (including people and their communities), processes and factors (including any economic and social theories) are useful or harmful to the economy and social spheres of the modern state.

2.Using positive technology of cognition «PTCH», I created the semantic content of the monographs entitled: «Socio-economic theory No. 1»; «Critical analysis of the modern, market economy»; «The positive state and its positive economy and social sphere» and so on.

Critical analysis of the economic theory of «Economics».

1. From the author.

This monograph is devoted to the study of socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of the economic theory called «Economics», which is currently the theoretical foundation for the creation and application of a modern, market economy. In this monograph, using the dialectical methods and tools of knowledge that I have created, I precisely establish whether this economic theory is an «intellectual truth», the application of which as a theoretical foundation for the creation and application of modern economics and the social sphere is allowed in a modern state, or whether this economic theory is an «intellectual delusion» or even worse «pseudoscientific, economic theory», the use of which as a theoretical foundation for the creation and application of the modern economy and social sphere should be strictly prohibited in the modern state, since the continuation of the application of any «pseudo-scientific, economic theory», including the economic theory of» Economics»:

1. Leads to the inevitable destruction of the modern, market economy in all modern states and, as a consequence of this process, leads to the destruction of all modern states.

2. It leads to continuous socio-economic wars for profit, including the use of atomic weapons, and as a consequence of this socio-economic process, it leads to the destruction of all biological organisms existing on the Earth’s surface.

The semantic content of this monograph is written clearly and simply and may be of interest to all people who are interested in the problems of a modern, market economy.

V. Alekseev

1. The object of this research work.

The object of this research work is the economic theory called «Economics», which is currently the theoretical foundation for creating a modern, market economy and social sphere in all modern states.

2. The purpose of this research paper.

The purpose of this research work is to apply the positive, dialectical method of critical, dialectical analysis (abbreviated «MCDA») created by me, to accurately establish the socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of an intellectual tool of cognition called the economic theory «Economics» and, based on the results of this critical analysis, make an accurate decision about the permissibility (possibility) of using it. or the impossibility of applying the economic theory of «Economics» as a theoretical foundation for creating a modern economy and social sphere in all modern states

3. Intellectual tools of cognition used in this research work.

In this research work, the positive, dialectical technology of cognition of the socio-economic activity of mankind (abbreviated «PTCM») and its positive, dialectical methods and tools, including the method of critical, dialectical analysis (abbreviated «MCDA»), are used as intellectual tools for cognition of the socio-economic activity of mankind.

Introduction

1. Those of you, readers, who are familiar with the content of my other research works in the field of economics, know that the main positive, socio-economic goal that all people on Earth should strive to achieve is the creation of a society of cultured people in every modern state. Only the implementation of this main, positive goal will make it possible to stop the negative process of the inevitable destruction of the negative, unfair, criminal, thievish, market economy and social sphere in all modern states, as well as to stop the continuous socio-economic wars for profit, including with the use of the army and weapons, between modern, negative states on the market. global market of raw materials, goods and services, and therefore will prevent the outbreak of the third and last world war, with the use of nuclear weapons, which will result in the complete destruction of all, without exception, biological organisms on the surface of the Earth.

2. Scientists from all over the world, as part of humanity, should also strive to achieve the main, positive, socio-economic goal. They should understand that their scientific activity is not only a tool for learning, but also a tool for achieving the main positive socio-economic goal. Scientists all over the world should understand that the results of their scientific activities should not be a tool for destroying the economy and social sphere, and they should also understand that the results of their scientific activities should not be a tool for creating a negative worldview about the socio-economic activities of humanity in modern people.

Remark.

1. The dialectical terms called positive and negative have the following semantic content, namely:

1.1. Positive, socio-economic object, process or factor means a scientifically organized, scientifically grounded, scientifically necessary, socio-economic object, process or factor (including an intellectual tool for understanding the socio-economic activity of mankind).

1.2. Negative, socio-economic object, process or factor means a non-scientifically organized, non-scientifically grounded, non-scientifically necessary, socio-economic object, process or factor (including an intellectual tool for understanding the socio-economic activity of mankind). I finish my comment.

3. Positive and negative are in this case socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of socio-economic objects, processes or factors (including intellectual tools for understanding the socio-economic activity of mankind).

4. Each socio-economic, qualitative characteristic of socio-economic objects, processes or factors (including intellectual tools for understanding the socio-economic activity of mankind) must meet strictly defined, positive, socio-economic criteria.

5. In the study of socio-economic and qualitative characteristics of intellectual tools of cognition of the socio-economic activity of mankind (dialectical terms, sentences, postulates (axioms, statements, laws), theories of cognition), the socio-economic and qualitative characteristics of the semantic content of intellectual tools of cognition are investigated.

According to the content of the positive technology of cognition «PTCM»:

5.1. The semantic content of an intellectual tool for cognizing the socio-economic activity of mankind is scientifically organized if it is created using positive, dialectical methods and tools of positive cognition technology (abbreviated as «PTCM»), including if it is created using positive, Socio-economic theory No. 1.

5.2. The semantic content of an intellectual tool for understanding the socio-economic activity of mankind is not scientifically organized if it is created using negative, dialectical methods and tools of negative cognition technology (abbreviated as «NTCM»).

5.3. The semantic content of an intellectual tool for understanding the socio-economic activity of mankind is scientifically justified if it corresponds (does not contradict) to the following criteria: the semantic content of the positive technology of cognition» PTCM», including corresponds to (does not contradict) the semantic content of positive Socio-economic theory No. 1.

The semantic content of an intellectual tool for understanding the socio-economic activity of mankind is scientifically justified if its application allows creating a positive semantic content of the laws of socio-economic movement, interaction and change of people and their communities (enterprises, organizations, states).

5.4. The semantic content of an intellectual tool for cognizing the socio-economic activity of mankind is not scientifically justified if it does not correspond (contradicts) to the content of the intellectual tool of cognition of the socio-economic activity of mankind. the semantic content of the positive technology of cognition «PTCM», including does not correspond (contradicts) the semantic content of positive Socio-economic theory No. 1.

The semantic content of an intellectual tool for understanding the socio-economic activity of mankind is not scientifically justified if its application does not allow creating a positive, semantic content of the laws of socio-economic movement, interaction and change of people and their communities (enterprises, organizations, states).

5.5. The semantic content of an intellectual tool for understanding the socio-economic activity of mankind is scientifically necessary if its use leads to the creation of a positive, semantic content of other intellectual tools for understanding the socio-economic activity of mankind and, as a result, leads to the creation of a positive, socio-economic worldview about the socio-economic activity of mankind, which leads to the creation of a society of cultured people.

5.6. The semantic content of an intellectual tool for understanding the socio-economic activity of humanity is not scientifically necessary if its use leads to the creation of negative, semantic content of other intellectual tools for understanding the socio-economic activity of humanity and, as a result, leads to the creation of a negative, socio-economic worldview about the socio-economic activity of humanity which leads to the creation of a society of uncultured people.

6. Since the economic theory called «Economics» is a set of dialectical terms, propositions and postulates (axioms, statements, laws) that are interrelated in their semantic content, as well as theories of knowledge of the socio-economic activity of mankind, I must therefore carry out a critical, dialectical analysis of the semantic content of dialectical terms, propositions and postulates (axioms, propositions, laws). statements, laws), theories that make up this economic theory. Since the semantic content of all the above-mentioned dialectical terms, propositions, and postulates (axioms, statements, laws), and theories is interrelated, I can therefore not investigate absolutely all these intellectual tools of knowledge, but limit myself to the study of the semantic content of primary and several secondary intellectual tools of knowledge.

7. If, as a result of carrying out a critical, dialectical analysis of the intellectual tools of cognition under study, I accurately establish that the semantic content of the intellectual tools under study is positive, that is, scientifically organized, scientifically justified, scientifically necessary, then I can state for sure that the semantic content of economic theory is the same as the semantic content of economic theory. The term «Economics „is positive and therefore this intellectual tool for understanding the socio-economic activity of mankind is an“ intellectual truth» and it is allowed to be used as a theoretical foundation for creating and applying the economy and social sphere of a modern state.

8. If, as a result of carrying out a critical, dialectical analysis of the intellectual tools of cognition under study, I accurately establish that the semantic content of the intellectual tools under study is negative, that is, not scientifically organized, not scientifically justified, not scientifically necessary, then I can state for sure that the semantic content of the intellectual tools under study is negative, that is, not scientifically organized, not scientifically justified, not scientifically necessary. the content of the economic theory called» Economics «is negative and therefore this intellectual tool for understanding the socio-economic activity of mankind is at best an» intellectual delusion «or at worst a» pseudoscientific intellectual tool» of knowledge and it is strictly forbidden to use it as a theoretical foundation for creating and applying the economy and social sphere of a modern state.

Remark.

If, as a result of critical analysis, it is clearly established that the economic theory called «Economics» is at best an «intellectual fallacy» or at worst a «pseudoscientific intellectual tool» of knowledge, and at the same time if the government of a modern state continues to apply it as a theoretical foundation for the creation and application of a modern economy and social sphere, then the result of applying the economic theory «Economics», as a theoretical foundation for the creation and application of the economy and social sphere, will be the creation, and then the inevitable destruction of a negative, market economy and social sphere in the result of this negative socio-economic process will be the complete destruction of this modern state. After I have told you, the reader, the algorithm (order) of my actions to study the socio-economic, qualitative characteristics of the economic theory called «Economics», I can begin a critical analysis of the primary, intellectual tools of knowledge that make up the economic theory «Economics». I finish my comment.

9.The primary intellectual tools that make up the economic theory of «Economics» are dialectical terms called «Cost of socio-economic capital» and «Money». According to the positive cognition technology «PTCM», I must establish qualitative, socio-economic characteristics of the semantic content of these dialectical terms.

8. Critical, dialectical analysis of the semantic content of the dialectical term «Cost».

8.1. According to an economic theory called Economics, the semantic content of the dialectical term «Cost» is formulated using dialectical terms as follows, namely:

1. Cost is the cost of human labor to create a product, measured in money.

2. Cost is the cost of money (money) for the purchase of goods, for the performance of works and services, for receiving benefits.

3. Cost is the price of the cost of producing a good, measured in money.

4. Cost-these are prices measured in money, which are formed as a result of competition between producers of goods on the market.

8.2. According to positive socio-economic theory No. 1, the semantic content of the dialectical term «Cost of socio-economic capital (in the form of human labor, raw materials, goods and services)» is formulated using dialectical terms as follows, namely:

1. «Cost of socio-economic capital» is a negative, i.e. not scientifically organized, not scientifically justified, not scientifically necessary, quantitative characteristic of socio-economic capital (in the form of human labor, raw materials, goods and services), the Cost of which is arbitrarily set by the owner of an enterprise or organization, including a government official.

2. An arbitrary «Cost of socio-economic capital» is a negative, economic instrument, the use of which leads to the creation of a negative, unfair, criminal, thievish, socio-economic process called» Not equivalent process of exchange of socio-economic capital (in the form of human labor, raw materials, goods and services)».

3. An arbitrary Cost of the «Cost of socio-economic capital» is a negative, economic instrument, with the help of which a socio-economic crime is committed against the citizens of a modern, negative state, since the consequence of its use is the creation of a negative, unfair, criminal, thievish, socio-economic process called «Not equivalent process of exchange socio-economic economic capital (in the form of human labor, raw materials, goods and services)».

4. An arbitrary Cost of the «Cost of socio-economic capital» is a negative, economic tool, with the help of which the overwhelming number of citizens of a modern, negative state turns first into people of socio-economic donors, and then into people of socio-economic PDSC (people completely deprived of socio-economic capital, as a result of the use of «Non equivalent process of exchange of socio-economic capital (in the form of human labor, raw materials, goods and services)» in the economy and social sphere of a modern, negative state.

Remark.