Бесплатный фрагмент - Kazakhs and Jews

Chapter 1

Why do we need God?

Our land is large and abundant, but it has no order. Yes, come to rule and own us.» («The Tale of Bygone Years»).

That’s how representatives of the Krivichi, Vesey, and Chudy turned to the Varangians to restore order — they stopped the tribal slaughter when, according to the chronicler, «the clan rose to the clan, strife began.» Then, three brothers came — Rurik, Sineus, and Truvor and, after a while, this land became known as Russia.

There are a lot of similar appeals in history. Not all of them were recorded literally. We can only guess about many of them (this may be an agreement after a personal meeting or a phone call from Bashar al-Assad to Putin, for example).

But it’s the same picture everywhere. The ongoing slaughter of the authorities on a formal occasion (nobility of the family, there are heretics, traitors, and others, other «wrong ones» in power — it is not brutal to find the reason if there is a great desire. And man is an inventive being). What did the state suffer from, as well as society and the people? People are starting to grumble. They don’t know what to do or where to run.

Then, a ruler «chosen by God himself» appears. In any case, this is what all the holy (religious) books say.

At the beginning of the 4th century, the Roman Empire declined. Barbarians were harassing her from all sides. The legal division of the empire for two Augustans and two Caesars essentially anticipated the famous feudal separatism in the future. When people do not know who is the most important, they fall into prostration (not literally, of course; everyone continues to do everyday things out of habit, but anxiety lives in everyone’s soul. And where there is anxiety, there are antidepressants. What kind of universal antidepressants can there be if they haven’t been invented yet? Yes, of course, these are idols! — time-tested practice). There cannot be two leaders in an empire. This disrupts its mechanisms. Any system has a hierarchy, especially in the empire. From here, whoever wins will be deified! And ministers of worship and associates — future court oligarchs and the people. The people themselves need a king. He cannot live «without a king in his head» (if any modern Zeref lives without a king in his head, he is likely no longer a Zeref, but a Refag — praying for money, dollars there, etc.).

So, Emperor Constantine saw the sign of the cross before the battle with Maxentius (other churchmen say that he dreamed. Lev Gumilev also claims that most of his soldiers were already Christians because they painted crosses on Roman scutum shields. And besides, his wife was also a Christian — an essential factor of suggestion).

So, after defeating Maxentius, Constantine proclaimed religious tolerance and legalized Christianity. From that moment on, Christians have now equalized the rights of the pagans to the Mithraists. That is, he inevitably became «great» as well. Not immediately, but 67 years later, Christianity took over all the cults and became the state religion. Which was exactly what needed to be proved. The Empire has healed well, peacefully, calmly. And not very much.

There is such a moment here. More like a stereotype. That monotheism is proclaimed precisely with a centripetal tendency, then with the consolidation of central power.

And what are the motives for the monarchy? Why do monarchs need God? Not detachments of gods, not a pantheon, not a multitude of assorted egotistically unpredictable deities, but one universal and transcendent God (which the Jews have had for 6,000 years, say, and then for 2,000 years for Christians, for example), which is not visible, but it is everywhere. And everyone knows about it.

If Constantine had not chosen Christianity, what would have happened?

But nothing. Another civil war. The battle of all with all, as in the primitive era.

And now we are giving away the greatest secret — the secret of separatism of all times and peoples (even now, this rule acts as a natural mechanism of nature).

Yes, perhaps Constantine is really great, as his descendants called him. But he was just a man, albeit over-empowered by his Roman society. He needed a victory over his personal rivals for power. And Christian warriors as an effective means of this victory.

But Constantine the Great (and similar greatness to him in history) did not know the great secret of zeref (tribal reflection). The Zerefs of the past and present won’t let me lie.

All the Zerefs in the world are pagans. The pagans have many deities — idols of various modifications. There are so many of these gods among different peoples that it is impossible to remember all of them and not list them all. But all these gods were on their own. And they fought among themselves — just like people, that is, any deity is a product of human experience, any idol climbed from a posteriori — where a man’s imagination, especially a savage, can reach.

The same code of conduct guides all the Zerefs of the world. Especially those Zerefs who claimed tribal (feudal, monarchical, communist, even democratic) power. All Zerefs become Zerots — the traditional elite — acting according to the same law — «the first and me or the second?». Even the smallest child, beginning to think, already knows his place. What can be said about adults with exactly the same knowledge or sudden ignorance of a given place? The situation of collapse, tragedy, misfortune, attacks by neighbors, or illness often creates this ignorance. People with such a reflection solve the problem of the first place long before the incident (I call this culture traditional or conservative for short). The ambiguity of the primary or secondary causes an immediate reflex of fraternal slaughter. Power is sweet. Even despite the absence of force majeure, people with a similar culture are ready in advance (but they do not know this and are still hugging in public) for a bloody fight. It is having a question — am I the first or the second? Doesn’t everyone ask themselves who is he, and where is he? And for the Zerefs, this is a sharp reaction of envy and undisguised ill-will — am I the first or the second?

Therefore, when they receive one god, the Zerefs go blind. Their instinct for power, primacy, and secondariness is silenced and clogged with fear. And God is the mediator. The one god of monotheism is the shadow of the emperor, which neither jealousy, envy, nor malice can reach. If they want to challenge the emperor about something, they see God. That there is an excellent remedy for separatism.

On the other hand, the modern religion of money generates so many separatists that they declare war on everyone around them and do not know about it themselves.

Chapter 2

What did G-D wean the Jews from for 2000 years

«There will be a powerful king who will have great power and who will do whatever he wants.»

(Daniel 11:3,4).

In the east, in the Roman Empire, there lived a very restless people — the Jews.

They got into some kind of story all the time.

They were in conflict with their neighbors all the time (under Joshua, when they took the «promised land»). They were attacked (by the Egyptians, Philistines, Arameans who remained after the genocide of the Goyim of Canaan) and enslaved by the Assyrians (at the first destruction of the temple of Solomon).

They had just eliminated the Seleucids’ oppression, as the Romans conquered them after a while.

The Romans did not punish anyone like that, but the Jews were perhaps the most unlucky in the history of nations (although, who knows, maybe God intended them to rule the world).

So they were punished. The Romans destroyed the Jewish shrine — the second temple of Herod the Great and demolished the walls of Jerusalem. The Jews have been scattered all over the world for 2,000 years.

The Jews always knew who was to blame.

They knew that it was always their own fault. That they started internal strife and civil war. Sinat hinam is the «senseless hatred» of Jews towards each other. Yes, the Jews themselves called the constant strife, quarrels, fights and the war of the Jews Sinat hinam.

The high priests had their argument about this.

They knew that punishment followed every time the Jews departed from the precepts of their God. And what was bequeathed to the Jews in the tablets? I will not list these commandments — you know them as well as I do. Speaking in the language of nationalists, the Jews were instructed not to be like the Goyim. And who is Takei goi? Goyim are people from the primitive tribal world. (According to revkon, Goyim are people with primary reflection — zerefs. «Am I the first or the second? The Zerefs carry this royal question with them all the time. This is the karma of the primitive world. It turns out that when the Jews became like the Amalekites, Muabites, Philistines, Nabataeans — all the peoples of Canaan, that is, they found out who was the first and who was the second, they were always punished. It turns out that G-d weaned the Jews from pride.

Am I the first or the second? How often do you ask yourself this question? This is a question that is appropriate to ask in a modern world overflowing with clown rulers. So far, you see two of the most obvious representatives of the entertainment genre. And there is fighting going on in one place. And the second one buys F-16s to resume the dispute over the Falkland Islands. But this is always just a distraction from the task.

I asked the question: why do showmen come to power?

I foresee the answer: It’s a conspiracy. This is a conspiracy of the world government and world financiers who want to reduce the world’s population.

This may be exactly the case. But don’t people, millions, billions, of people today, call themselves a «personality»? Isn’t this a veiled, the same «first-second» mantra? I’m certainly not the last type of person. I’m the best.

Chapter 3

Caesar and the Sheep

It just so happens that sheep should see the shepherd and the people the lord.

If ordinary people do not see the lord, they will begin to «command» themselves. And all shepherds know what comes of it (especially Kazakhs. This feeling is at the level of genetics in most people). Sheep without a shepherd are doomed to be eaten by wolves. These are the laws of nature. There’s nothing you can do.

Examples of naturalism are not at all to entertain but to think.

When people do not see the master, they disperse (not necessarily literally, in the sense that they migrate to other parts of the world); when people do not have faith, they pray for inanimate objects (stones, things, money trees, tarot cards and stars with palmistry). If there are many faiths in the territory, then this is not just «democracy»; this is total paganism — many gods, many elitists (in our case, many oligarchs. People want to get rich in order to be crypto leaders. And this is impossible. And every nouveau riche knows this. But to be a local leader for at least five minutes is the genetics of a wandering sheep).

So.

In order for the population not to disperse across the steppe, the «sheep» (sheep) should see one central figure of the «shepherd» (shepherd in Kazakh). Otherwise, the fattest of the herd begins to take the whole sheep to the wolves: all the meat and wool. At any moment, the most powerful oligarch can have all his billions taken away (and these are not his billions). It was the property of the whole herd — the people. Who lost both a strong leader and a core faith for a while.

So a strong leader and traditional faith are a guarantee of prosperity.

A weak leader and paganism portend future upheavals. But first, stealing or scattering sheep all over the world.

In this sense, Jews are the best teachers for all peoples, by their example (in 2000 years), teaching different nomads how to believe and how to live (so that wolves do not eat). The backgammon must have faith if the people do not have an obvious leader. The Jews have taught many people to believe in God. But first, the Jews believed in themselves. It is not for me to judge what came out of their God-chosen.

But let’s start, perhaps, with the fact that the wisest King Solomon had many wives and concubines (something like a thousand). He built the first temple. He spent a lot of money on it (and where does he get the money from? Only from the people). Female beauty is a fatal force. At the end of his wise reign (even inside Jerusalem), pagan temples appeared — well, how can you refuse your beloved woman? The Jews, although law-abiding to the supreme power, could not forgive this. Because the Jews (at least the ancients were definitely fanatical believers). So the son of the wisest Solomon, Jeroboam, inherited not only the consequences of pagan cults but also the murmur. As well as potential separatism.

And so it turned out. Instead of one Jewish state, two appeared — Israel was actually added to Judea. There were three tribes in Judea: Judah, Benjamin, and Levin. In Israel, that means the remaining nine (although it is believed that ten tribes — those living in Israel — were stolen into «Assyrian captivity». They didn’t come back from the word at all. Now everyone is still looking for these missing ten tribes — where did they go?).

To summarize.

All peoples who remember their families and seven tribes of ancestors, that is, who are in the tribal system even in modern times, are in danger. In danger of separatism. Which begins with paganism. Paganism begins if people remember not only their seven tribes — let them remember for their health — but also believe anyone (first the dollar and the euro, for example. And who is painted there).

Chapter 4

The people and the temple

For the God, your God will bless you, as He has told you, and you will lend to many nations, but you will not borrow; and you will rule over many nations, but they will not rule over you.

Deuteronomy 15:6

Although it is believed that the dispersion of the Jews occurred after the destruction of the second temple and the walls of Jerusalem by Titus in 70, in fact, a new uprising broke out in Judea after almost 60 years, the Bar Kokhba uprising, it was a great uprising. The Romans gathered up to a third of the imperial army and began using scorched earth tactics. (60 years between the second temple’s destruction — what does this mean? That means two generations. To make it clear, the Soviet government lasted 73 years. For eyewitnesses of the collapse of the USSR, this is a lot. For us, 70 years is almost an eternity. We have not all seen our grandfathers, who lived at one time with the Russian Revolution of 1917. And what fits into the Soviet segment does not require explanation — there are a lot of events.

What did the Jews do after the destruction of their shrine? After almost 2,000 years, it seems that everything is so simple. No, it’s not easy. It takes time for the fruit to ripen). The Romans dealt with Judea the same way they did with Carthage — they destroyed Jerusalem to the ground and built their city, Aelia Capitolina, on that place. A coin was issued with a bull drawing a furrow in the center. This was the last straw. For sixty years, the Jews lived without their shrine — without their temple. And what is the Jewish people without a temple? It would be best if you were a Jew to understand the extent of the Jewish trauma of that time.

Jews differ from all nations in their doctrine of being chosen by God. That is, they built (and are building) their relationship based on the dichotomy of us and the Goyim, we and the pagans, «us and them.» This meant that every Jew was a privileged member of a privileged people. (All other conservative nations have an internal hierarchy; there is an elite, and there is a rabble. Low people have to know their place. Ordinary people have always known their place until Modern times. Aspen will not bear oranges. And when the crisis of power — system — morality comes, when the queue is broken, the inevitable troubled times will come. Hindus used to say that the power of the Vaishnavas, especially the Sudras, after the troubles, is the most dangerous).

Jews are no less conservative people who adhere to traditions, primarily temple traditions; that is, Jews have everything tied to temples and the spiritual component of Jewish rituals — they may be one of the most conservative peoples on the earth, besides with will. Jews also revere elders and knowledge, but especially the spiritual teachers of the Rabbis (even the Tzaddiks in exile). If we take as a basis that the government — -system — morality is in crisis, like in other nations, then Jews do not break the order, do not dream of overtaking spiritual people for a piece (especially today, at the moment of the greatest triumph of democracy among all Goyim when the Goyim everywhere mired in corruption — at the instigation, of course, of the same, the richest Jewish clans. Jews are well aware, due to their 2000-year residence among the other folks, of the greed of people, including their elites, and the lack of real leaders. Therefore, this situation of the absence of elites to them needs to be maintained. The situation can be presented as follows. If Jews are guided by the motto “we and they,” then the elites of other post-traditional peoples live by the principles: the state is me, also “we and you,” that is, we are the elite, and you are our slaves. Thus, for the most primitive, at the moment of crisis, “we and you” turns into “the first me or the second?” It is the most archaic form of hierarchy. And at the moment of the highest democracy among the Goyim — “we are no worse than others,” which tacitly means “beat the elite” or “choose clowns” to power, the worse at the top, the more fun for us. Hence, it is noticeable that all conditional Goyim constantly live with complexes, carrying a sense of inferiority, depression, jealousy, envy, and schadenfreude. Goyim without an elite and morality become callous and bestial, turn into Nazis and fascists, or imitate — become crypto liberals and Democrats. But it’s a mask that jumps off easily. That is why it is very important for such people “without a temple” to have an elite or at least respect for knowledge, talent, and professionalism. Do the people “without a temple” respect ordinary teachers now? No, they don’t respect anybody. They are fighting for literally any piece today, like jackals and dogs. The most talented and gifted are being bullied on social media. Why? But because there is no morality, no system, no support. There is no confidence in the future. The situation is at the sinking ship and “save who can”).

Chapter 5

How to avoid war and slavery

For the Lord your God will bless you, as He has told you, and you will lend to many nations, but you won’t lend to your people

Deuteronomy 15:6

!Meanwhile, the path is indicated through which domination over the peoples will be established — «to lend to many peoples» (independently, you can give to one person or to the government at interest. The size of the receiving subject does not change the essence. After a while, both the person and the government will get into debt)

This is obvious, how such spirituality and commitment to one source determine the fate of a nation.

The very attitude of being chosen, «us or them» — we and other peoples in the spiritual world has been crucial for 3,000 years.

What to do with strangers?

All pagans — modern nationalists, fascists and pagans (including pagans before our era) — know (knew) perfectly well. Strangers were always treated badly. Literally and violently. Violence is a clear indicator of barbarism and lack of spirituality.

All pagans (including modern ones) have many gods. They worship — they perform ancestor worship rituals. Either — this is the most massive group of people now — worship the golden calf (that is, money). Even if several billion people go to Buddhist temples, churches, and mosques, this does not prevent them from thinking about money. Sorry, there is no communism yet. There was no Second Coming, and there was no kingdom of God. De jure, you can declare yourself a Christian, a Muslim, a Hindu, de facto behave like the same Jews who did not wait for Moses from Sinai.

It’s another matter when there is one G-d.

You can lend money to strangers at interest, but you can and should help your own people. Isn’t there a monotony here? Moreover, is there no chauvinism?

And how else to confirm your superiority?

It’s very simple — to lend money. Then harvest the «harvest». No violence — everything is voluntary.

The whole world today gives loans, loans, and tranches at interest. Who did modern bankers learn from? And who were the first bankers? Who wrote out the first bills? The whole world is obsessed with profit today. Are all people in the race for money? Who they all work for during the race madness. Who do all these stock exchanges work for?

It’s not hard to guess. All these bankers, industrialists, fund managers, brokers, and prime ministers have received interest in growth — they make a profit for themselves, and at the same time, they return it to whom? — to the original source. Everyone who takes out a loan or mortgage plays by the rules (to be more precise, according to the prescription of the most ancient spiritual monument.

Why are there no Christian banks in the world?

Why does the Pope bless all kinds of obscenities?

Why are almost all European politicians now clowns?

Because they depend on money, maybe they personally are not literally slaves of money, although it is doubtful — they are also evolutionarily derived, as in an incubator, of European bourgeois values. And who is the bourgeoisie’s god?

Are there any alternatives to this?

Islamic banks are practicing Islamic banking.

They do not give in to growth. After receiving the result, the result is divided into agreed parts. In case of failure, one Islamic bank loses money, the other side expended efforts. Full trust

Although Islamic banking currently represents a small percentage of global transactions, it is an obvious alternative to global paganism. Clown rulers have not yet been recorded in Islamic countries or even secular communities — states that do not practice fundamental Islam.

Chapter 6

Who do Kazakhs study with?

You can love yourself. You can love people. Jews are obviously the most ideological in this sense.

When the sages were looking for the Philosopher’s Stone, other revolutionaries constantly fought for freedom, equality, and justice; the Jews believed in themselves and their people. Or rather, they had exceptional faith. This cannot be called simple nationalism, which is known to the world relatively recently. How was it recently? Approximately, maybe 300 years. And the Jews had «nationalism» when no one yet knew what money, property, and the economy were (money has always been in human society, but not everyone). Because of the specific behavior because of the desire for isolation, many looked at Jews with suspicion. The Jews were locked up all the time, one might say, in their little world. More precisely, they gathered to perform a religious cult — others were jealously not allowed into this world. Do you want to marry Moisha’s daughter? Convert to Judaism — make a giyur. Keep the commandments of the Torah. And no more questions. In this sense, Jewish women have always been more zealous and submissive: they followed «don’t marry them» more strongly than men. (Well, they couldn’t, especially after the Babylonian captivity. Moreover, the priest Ezra ordered all Jews to divorce those who had got the «wrong» wife or the wrong husband in 70 years. And after all, everything was fulfilled. In order not to dissolve or disappear among other nations. But that was before our era. However, then, everything was repeated. Jews were being chased. Jews were oppressed. A lot has changed. But the fundamentals have remained the same. Today, the times are liberal, it seems, if we are talking about marriages. That is not the point. There is even an opinion that the USSR was destroyed, too, on purpose because there were many mixed marriages. What nonsense! We know that the USSR collapsed independently — see my book «Tradition Against Communism.» When the Russian Revolution took place in 1917, who was accused? No secrets, no Jews. When Russia became a democracy, who did it? Why are there solid oligarchs and bankers ...There’s something wrong here. The oligarch Berezovsky said that Jews are more adapted to everything. What is, is. They are always ahead. Who are all newspaper editors in our area? Yes, what is there in the region — all over Kazakhstan. First, this is the so-called tabloid press, which provides a quick and guaranteed income. Could any Kazakh have guessed about the income? Could any Kazakh write about all sorts of «obscenities» — topics that ordinary people read? No, it’s not. The Kazakh will say: «Uyat.» Like, «It’s a shame.» Once, Mingrel Loria, provincial editor, told me: «If I print your philosophical opuses, my newspaper will have fifty readers.» And he’s right, unfortunately. Jews are immune, on the contrary, as it were. They know people. They know what people want. And Kazakhs are always interested in fame and honor — some kind of position. The Kazakhs hired editors to create an «illumination» of Kazakh democracy — the Kazakh showcase. Thirty years of independence have passed. And who are the editors? They’ve grown quite old. But they continue to depict full news counters for the Kazakhs. No, it’s not just Jews there. There are few Jews among the Kazakhs at all — this happened according to history. Basically, during the Great Patriotic War, intellectuals of all kinds moved from the western regions of the USSR to Tashkent and Alma-Ata, including professors, artists, and engineers. I looked at the teaching staff of the Aktobe Medical Institute when the first streams of Kazakh doctors were being prepared (my parents received diplomas in the first stream). Today, their children work well in human rights protection, first of all. In business, it’s kind of just supposed to be. Legal protection is always on the side of business.

Moreover, even if the very first human rights defender stumbled, all Kazakhstani human rights defenders and, of course, international human rights protection actively stood up for him (no Kazakh dreamed of such protection, especially his small educational newspaper «Bak», «bak» in Kazakh is happiness, short for «bakyt». When it was closed, no one noticed, no one said anything. Except for my late comrade in the opposition, Andrei Klimonov. Because officials and rich Kazakhs, and indeed all Kazakhs, «rights and freedoms» are not in the first place. Officials and the new rich want more money, and ordinary Kazakhs want to compete or are busy looking for daily bread).

Interestingly, all Jews used to be socialists, advocating equality and justice. Today, everyone is liberal. For human rights, for freedom. I will say that for a Kazakh and a Jew, freedom is something completely different (Kazakhs are paternal; they can lose everything if they are free). But the Kazakhs, again, as if they got into the first year and got excellent marks from the teachers. The Elbasy of the first one has already been replaced by the second president after thirty years of rule, and only liberals are on the air. Not Jews, and not Russians, but Kazakhs. These Democrats of the first wave have suffered a complete defeat and must sink through the ground, but again and again, the same faces. Kazakhs are liberals, piece pensioners + plus urban burghers from NGOs, which means that they receive money from the West for their views (bla- bla- bla), and they run ahead of the locomotive. We are liberals! We are Democrats! We are the best students! It looks somewhat comical. It causes nothing but irony. Everyone knows that money rules the whole world. But we want to demonstrate something. What do they say? A Kazakh without show-offs is a non-showy Kazakh. (This does not mean that «nagyz» Kazakh should be engaged exclusively in the glorification of ancestors).

Chapter 7

Unusual laws. 613

«The closer a state is to falling, the more laws it has.»

Cicero

«The ruin is not in the closets, but in the heads.»

Bulgakov. A dog’s heart

Formal laws and regulations are laid down in codes.

There are informal laws. They are more effective in conservative communities, among people who adhere to tradition.

There are many informal laws. But much less than formal ones. However, it is believed that the more cultured and civilized a people are, the more formal laws they have.

What happens if the conservative people «with traditions» have too much civilizational formality, and the laws do not work, after all, total corruption, mafia, and crime?

What is an informal relationship? It’s when you’re to me, I’m to you. You and I are relatives, brothers — in — law, and classmates — we can always come to an agreement.

What to do? How do you avoid «you to me, I to you»? How do you stop writing new laws that don’t work in such an environment?

This means that there is no need to chase after «advanced countries»

But let’s think about it. Let’s look back.

Let’s compare it.

To begin with, the history of all peoples is connected with religion. Moreover, the economic side, or what people were doing, directly impacted spiritual life.

We Kazakhs are Muslims. Jews are adherents of Judaism. This, for example.

The nomadic tribes of Central Asia did not immediately become Orthodox. The adoption of Islam stretched among the Nomads for five hundred years (more than five centuries). Moreover, the nomadic Turks were the main rivals of the same nomadic Arabs before the fall of the Western Turkic Khaganate. Well, intraspecific rivalry is much more cruel than interspecific rivalry — it has long been known if such a strange similarity of a nomadic «species» is appropriate here at all. In those days, the Arabs and Turks had cattle breeding as their primary occupation. Both the Nomadic Arabs and the Nomadic Turks had something to share. The question immediately creeps up: isn’t that why almost all Turks became Muslims? The Western Turkic Khaganate collapsed like the USSR. (When all the newly minted presidents who appeared after the collapse of the USSR republics immediately proclaimed the direction of «democracy.» They built communism, and afterward, they turned 180 degrees. This is all because the winners always dictate the direction: in the case of the USSR, it is the USA; in the competition of nomads, it is the Arabs). Thus, the Arabs, in the form of winners, first rode to the oases of Transoxiana to control the caravans with goods. Then, they took care of the rest of the nomads so that they would not rob passing caravans out of savagery and indiscipline. Everything is logical.

Of course, faith is of great importance already because it determines the future. But this is not our topic: although Kazakhs and Jews come into contact with each other spontaneously and indirectly. Spontaneity and mediation are already in the fact that Kazakhs did not directly contact Jews until the 21st century. However, due to the development of «democracy» and market relations after the collapse of the USSR, they joined the global liberal market trend. There is no need to remind you who the inventor of banking is. The fact that Kazakhs today trade everything (primarily natural resources) and do not roam «according to their grandfather’s habit» is a spontaneous and age-old mediation. As befits all conservative peoples, Kazakhs have never recognized money as the meaning of life. Kazakhs got acquainted with money, and now monetary relations, we can say recently, in the 19th century so-so, in the 20th century in the form of a Soviet salary, and only in the 21st century in the form of a bank loan and a means of enrichment.

And the Jews?

The Jews, both before and after their dispersion and wandering around the world, have always been conservative. They were bullied and persecuted precisely for their adherence to conservative values — namely, for observing the Sabbath and other Torah precepts. They did not want to merge with others in one burst of the deepest feelings because they had specific feelings. This is the most «their,» only their own, which has always looked strange and suspicious to others. Therefore, if all sorts of disasters, misfortunes, and epidemics happened, everyone immediately found the reason — who was to blame for the disaster and misfortune? It was very convenient. The reason has always lived in the neighborhood. Do you know when the first Jewish ghetto appeared?

In Alexandria, Egypt.

This is the Jewish quarter of Delta.

In 38, the Greeks staged the first known Jewish pogrom in history.

Why?

The Jews had a king. The Greeks didn’t have it. The Jews had their ethnarch leader, and the Greeks had a crowd of elders. The Jews did not want to send their children to the Alexandrian gymnasiums, to Greek-type educational institutions where semi-naked young men studied (historically, physical perfection has always been in trend among the Greeks; what can you do). Why didn’t they want to give their sons to it? So that Jewish youths would not switch to Greek culture. Although the Jewish community lived autonomously, at the same time, wealthy Jews wanted to have Roman citizenship in order not to pay a poll tax for like «non-citizens».

Moreover, the Jews refused to erect statues of emperors — the Roman gods at that time so as not to desecrate the synagogues with pagan cults. It’s in the Roman Empire! When Caligula was informed about this, he immediately ordered his statue to be erected in the Jerusalem temple (if the statue had been placed in the temple, it would immediately have caused another Jewish uprising). This order was then safely forgotten (because the conspirators in Rome overthrew Caligula).

You must have a crowned leader (Caesar, kagan, Khan) to have your state.

To have a sacred leader, one must observe rituals. And not just pagan impersonal ones. All pagan rituals are impersonal. All the rituals of the nomads of the pre-Muslim period were impersonal.

To observe the rituals, you need to stop. Take a look around. In the end, you can put any inanimate object, anything, in the center of the village and pray for this inanimate object. When the whole family and all the relatives roam from place to place, no one will carry an extra load. There is no time to erect a portable altar on the way or at the next parking lot. Then, in a difficult moment, no one will remember something inanimate. Therefore, there will be no internal contact. It is easier to remember all the relatives who can help if they can help both the living and those who are no longer in the world. This is how the cult of ancestors appeared. This is how Shamanism appeared.

But when tribes join a military alliance, each clan has its ancestors. How can they unite even deeper to form a single whole? Apart from a common enemy or a future victim, there is nothing to come up with. The motive of «capture and robbery», the motive of «extraction». Nothing more. But there has always been an interest in a long union.

Then the cult of the eternal sky appeared — the cult of Tengri.

The whole problem is that the Tengrian cult did not have rituals.

And why were there no rituals?

When the prophet Moses descended from Mount Sinai, he brought the Jews tablets — stone plates with laws carved on them. 613 laws! Is it a lot or a little?

It is enough to create a strong state because these are unusual laws.

Chapter 8

«You give me; I give you.»

Yes, you are right; it is the laws of morality, or even more precisely, the sacred laws, that consolidate civil laws. Without morality, little works. There are no citizens at all. Actually, with tribal thinking, there have never been citizens — these are all evolutionary bells and whistles. Where shamans rule, prosecutors and lawyers cry bitterly out loud and to themselves because no one listens to them. Or it executes by inertia. If no one sees, he does what he wants. And what does any Zeref want in any part of the world (even now, even before our era)? Provide for yourself and your family.

(This is natural and does not concern the «chosen ones». They created a people-family long ago; over 2000 years, it has contributed to a compacted cortex among in everyone in the «family». The real Goyim that practice you give me, I give you — it’s the opposite — the cortex is thin. These traditionalists have been practicing the same thing for a thousand years and would have practiced another thousand years: brotherhood to their own and hostility to others. You can bring anyone under your own or someone else’s, but do not forget about the intraspecific struggle, which is much tougher than interspecific. Still, the world’s democratizers do not give up, and all the time, they expose the level of some local native corruption. They repeatedly shake their fingers, reproach, and threaten to provoke the Maidan. They scare by Maidan, various dictators, and autocrats who have bred tribalism, nepotism, and corruption. And who helps them? Who are the leading Kazakh liberals from various NGOs helping there to get rid of the costs of autocracy? We talked about the world’s financiers. My friends! I try to present the facts as they are. Unbiased. Anyway, as it turns out. So that everyone can read and then compare.

We went through the ads last summer. One talkative woman told how someone helped her son at the competition. One person bought a sports uniform and paid for the trip. She was surprised, and we were surprised by her words: How did they know her son was Jewish? He had a Slavic surname. His father is from Ukraine.

This someone was most likely the head of the jury, one of the Eurasian group — very famous in the republic. That’s what solidarity is, carried through the centuries. This proxy help is planetary solidarity, unlike Zeref, «You give me, I give you.» Conservative Zerefs have local solidarity at commemorations, weddings, and other ceremonies. If a relative has risen, you can safely apply for a job. According to the conservative principle, they will never let you down. So it was, so it is).

Chapter 9

Why is there no democracy in Asia?

Probably everyone has asked themselves this question. Either he was embarrassed or embarrassed — why are all despotic regimes located only in Asia? It’s so not prestigious, so not fashionable, even disgusting. Is the whole world literally raving about democracy today? All young people are maximalists. And you? (Why, in fact, democracy? Who needs this democracy? Well, not to traders from the markets, most of whom have never been distinguished by their ideas. But there’s something about democracy that everyone likes. What is it? And why?).

So, freedom and democracy are only in America and Europe, and autocracy and totalitarianism are only in Asia (with rare exceptions).

Many thinkers have asked themselves the question: why? What exactly is «Asian despotism» and why exactly «European culture? Why is Asia always associated with harsh regimes?

Many people thought about it, but they never found an answer.

We shouldn’t be concerned about what was bothering these people.

We will answer so simply. Which confirms the thesis of simplicity.

So, do you find many people of Jewish nationality in Asia? Yes, yes, specifically Jews?

This thesis of simplicity is immediately corrected with our theme of this book. Moreover, we will try to infiltrate the plan of providence. Into the secret plans of G-d. can say.

Jews are called the yeast of various revolutions.

The role of revolutionaries in the Russian Revolution is especially noticeable. However, Jews were also active in Europe, as we recall the Bavarian Soviet Republic, the Bremen Soviet Republic, and the Hungarian Soviet Republic.

But Jews alone will not be enough if the people are not ready for freedom, for civil rights, if the people are traditional, conservative and used to living in a hierarchy for centuries.

In this case, no ideological yeast will help. Everything will return to normal. If peoples have lived in a traditional trend for centuries, it is so convenient for them, all riots can be attributed to natural disasters.

For the emergence of the spirit of freedom, a search for freedom is needed, liberation from some infringement.

In my other books, I wrote: for any new thinking, for the revolution of the spirit, migration is needed — flight from my father’s house, flight from the place of birth. It’s not just about the memory of others who know everything, know their father, mother, relatives, ancestors, and what they did. It’s all about inertia. There should be no black sheep in a flock of sheep. All upstarts must escape from this hell of collective memory.

Look around in a new place, get used to it, and evaluate your chances and opportunities. There are already new people here — the same fugitives, the same hodgepodge of children without inheritance. If people are used to order and discipline, no Hasidic Jew will help. We need Jews who have broken away from the community, who have renounced Judaism, Sabbatai Jews, Morans, crosses, socialists, and Marxists. Why are they? Because Jews have a lot of experience of wandering. Most of all. What is not clear here?

How many Persians, Hindus, or Chinese have wandered the world?

What are the Jewish communities in India and China, and how many people are there in them? Several thousand.

And how many Jews live in France? And how many of them were there in tsarist Russia? Do you understand that?

One escape of extra mouths from the countryside from landlessness is not enough here. This is the main, but not the main, factor of any unrest, but above all, tension. Tsar Stolypin’s prime minister tried to solve the land issue by resettling and reformatting peasant thinking. It didn’t work out. If we follow our logic, then the disease was treated by the disease itself. Capitalist relations provoke a «migration» of the spirit — away from places of permanent residence, despite the current morality. That’s when you need the yeast of new consciousness from people wandering for 2000 years. No Zeref needs freedom. Zeref needs land. It’s simple. For the Zerefs to look at least a little beyond today, an idea is needed. When revolutionaries pass away, they must be on the same wavelength as the people. Bring a hundred Marx, Trotsky, Luxemburg to the pygmies, they’ll just eat them. Literally. Today some nations literally eat, but curse. They reduce all their troubles to Jews.

G-d’s plan was not to punish his eternally rebellious people within Judea. It’s not that they became hypocrites, Pharisees and scribes («Pharisees and scribes»), who mumbled 613 rules and turned everything into a formality. Not because they deviated from the commandments and not because they crucified Christ and continued to be Pharisees. «We are the chosen ones!». It’s about them rocking Europe with their banks and then with revolutions. It was pointless for them to go to Asia. Inertial people have always lived in Asia. They are very disciplined. Little traveling, little migrating.

Only nomads could understand Jews!

And the Khazar Turks were the first to do this.

What came out of it did not work out (and why it did not work out), we will explore further.

Chapter 10

If it’s a monarchy, what is it?

When a nomadic horde consists of different peoples, each king thinks about unity. There may be friction even within the same clan, so what can we say about the problems within the tribal union? How long will the tribes be together? It depends on several reasons, and from the purpose of unification, this is the most important thing.

For nomads, the main goal of the Horde is to repel foreign aggression or attack in the form of active defense — Si vis pacem, para bellum (from Latin. — «If you want peace, prepare for war»). Only constant danger dictated military democracy. It was only in the name of repelling enemies that military democracy turned into an «Asian dictatorship.» That is, if democracy is only military, when everything is decided exclusively by warriors — exclusively for victory, if the Horde is an Alliance of warriors, then only despotism and monarchy — in the name of ensuring that the warriors do not scatter, do not gallop off in all directions.

«Am I the first or the second»?

There can be no other authority among people with constant «first — second» reflection, and it shouldn’t. Any other deviation, relaxation, or division of power causes the disintegration, first of the Horde Union, then of the state. Any «European» dress-in type of republic for such a military-type community is fraught with the end of existence. (If the descendants of former soldiers change into civilian «European dress,» this does not mean that they have changed; it does not mean that they have ceased to be the same people, the same warriors. The primary definition of such inheritance is the «first — second» behavior. Suppose the socialist community members, such people, feel some semblance of equality. In that case, they will become the most unbridled anarchists — the most freedom-loving nomadic Cossacks. These most primitive hunters can only be brought to order by the most disgusting dictatorship for European taste (but also the most «beloved» at the same time in genetically pagan catacombs). It’s just that these people don’t know about it. They succumb to propaganda and vanity: we are Europeans! There are modern Asians who don’t even look in the mirror, especially their women, put on makeup — you can’t tell the difference)

Sooner or later, the king will feel that the warriors are scattered, so they are losing their mood. Then he decides to perpetuate his power — proclaims the monarchy (the most unloved foreign power for Jews).

The Western Turkic khaganate existed for a short historical time (almost like the USSR, something like seventy years. But even seventy years was a lot for the nomads. Nomadic empires are short — lived — see my book «Kazakhs and Turks»).

With the collapse of the Western Turkic Khaganate, a new tribal conglomerate was formed — the Khazars. At one time, the Turkyuts marched across the steppes — in thirty years, they conquered almost the entire steppe. They even took Crimea. And who could resist them? After the Ephthalites, no one. Therefore, all the nomadic tribes that lived from Crimea to Manchuria accepted the Turks — the most brave army at that time and recognized themselves as members of the Horde. All the former Eastern Iranian tribes, Chionites, Kidarites, Dahs, Caucasian Albanians, Finno — Ugric Siberians, and descendants of the Huns formed a new Horde under the royal Turkic Ashina clan. All the neighbors began to call them Khazars. Not only were the Turks nomads, but these tribes were all nomads, so the Khazar Khaganate was primarily a Horde.

And nomads never stand still. They shouldn’t be standing anyway.

If the nomads stop, the warriors will disperse.

Therefore, while all the diverse nomads gathered in a Horde, it was a horde. And when all these people became Khazars, they became the Khazar Khaganate.

If monarchical power develops, it cannot exist without ideology.

That is why, sooner or later, in the Khazar Khaganate, during its peak, there was a need for a new religion.

Monarchical power needs monotheism.

The nomads, out of the habit of deifying the sky, first deified their kagan. The first kagans were strangled during initiation with a shoelace according to ancient shamanistic rules — how long, they say, do you want to rule? Kagan could have ordered for himself for many years — is it difficult to prepare for a trance?

The fact is that many years are many events, and the events could have been tragic. The «son of heaven» was always responsible for the lack of food for cattle, for jute, and hunger. All the murmur, then the curse and the anger of the people would have switched over by the kagan — so, they were killing, and they killed with the words «it was a bad son of Tengri.»

The only ones who were not touched were the military leaders, the Beks.

One of the most influential Beks, Bulan, converted to Judaism at this time. And looking at all this pagan action, he was full of disgust.

Why, in fact, did Judaism begin to spread among the soldiers?

Because the warriors guarded the caravans. The most important source of income of the empire is the control of trade routes and the collection of duties.

In the centuries-old confrontation with Byzantium, the shahs of Sasanian Iran blocked the caravan trade (they pursued a policy of isolation, which is like sanctions. Under the motto, we will block the «Silk Road,» and Byzantium will disintegrate. So, by the middle of the 7th century, the caravan trade had withered away. All cultural countries, from Tang China to the European kingdoms of the early Middle Ages, were in crisis. Everyone was in crisis, but not the nomadic «savages» because savages are never dependent on trade. They depended on nature then and today on mineral resources).

The first to fall from the sanctions was not Byzantium but Sassanid Iran. Arabs, nomadic warriors, and, at that time, already devout Muslims took the Persians almost with their bare hands — the birdman himself was caught in the net.

The Arabs began to control the entire central part of the caravan route. The Arabs had their merchants. Mostly descendants of non-noble Arabs who began to study with Jews. All neophyte traders are distinguished by one trait — laziness. They are lazy and not inquisitive (show-off distinguishes all neophytes if first results are taken, and that’s it, no more want). They don’t travel far, even in the name of profit.

Therefore, the merchants of Rakhdonite (Jews, of course) appeared.

The Jews were «people of the Book.» Muslims recognized all the Jewish prophets. Mohammed the Prophet spoke warmly of the Jews. He lived among Jews. He watched them when I drove his wife’s caravans. Jewish communities have lived in northwestern Arabia among the Arabs since prehistoric times. Therefore, there was nothing hostile to them in the Quran. All early Muslims knew that Jews were stubborn in their delusion and nothing more. It must be said that Jewish merchants were free in the Khazar Khaganate before the adoption of Judaism because many Jews were living in the Khaganate. (All the nomads of the world are still tolerant. They hold all sorts of forums on this topic. President Nazarbayev loved this business very much — to unite the world’s religions. Has anyone ever wondered why?). One faction of Jews escaped from Iran in the 6th century, and they were classified as Mazdakids, religious reformers of Zoroastrianism. (Where there are riots and revolutions, the Jews are always to blame — have you forgotten?) The Byzantine Basileus Heraclius expelled another faction for opening the gates to the besieging Persians. (In case of capture of the city, who will be the first to be robbed?)

Jews hardly practiced proselytism. They reluctantly gave their beautiful daughters to the pagans. But this is a different case. All these Jews, both «Mazdakids» and «Byzantines» were refugees. And not ordinary Khazars wooed them, but outstanding warriors who guarded their caravans. There is no cure for love. To marry a Jewish woman, the Khazars were circumcised… Three generations later, the Khazars had Jewish commanders on their mother’s side (according to Halakha).

This very bek Bulan was a Jew by his mother and great-grandmother, most likely. The entire military elite of the Khazar Turks was ready, in a word, for monarchical power — for dictatorship.

This is where the paradox arises.

The Jews of Modern times do not like (and before) monarchical power in any form because it shows an established hierarchy within which it is difficult for talented foreigners to break through. This caused all the battles for the republican system and all the revolutions in the 19th and 20th centuries. The collapse of empires can be attributed to the struggle for freedom (including the struggle of the Jewish revolutionaries). However, the monarchical power differs from that of other monarchies, especially with Judaism being adopted as the state religion.

Chapter 11

To cancel holidays, to defame heroes

Under the monarchy, no one wanders or steals

Stealing means that some pagan savages are still roaming. Moreover, they are conscious of where they fall into savagery (as always) for the sake of things and objects. Still, they are well dressed, which means they consider themselves cultured people (even believers on certain days and events). But these are hypocrites. There have always been hypocrites. (But not to the same extent as now). The more the so-called civilization is layered on primitive zeref layers, the more ostentation and hypocrisy.

Well, have you built a democracy? — Can I ask all the New Democrats?

What does the democratic fiasco in almost all republics say after the collapse of the USSR?

About anything but democracy.

Outwardly, everything seems to be decent — you can’t find fault. There are a lot of illuminations, call signs, and beautiful facades, and everything is laid out with paving slabs.

People are not like that walking down the street, not like under socialism in general. They are richly and variously dressed now. Rich imported cars dissect the central avenues. Other transport — a little cheaper, they forced all the yards by it — not to pass. Hypermarkets have everything. People are rolling full trolleys to the cash register. There are few smiles. That’s what they have in their heads?

What other values are there besides commodity money?

Why are autocrats ruling everywhere instead of democracy? Who, of course, are presidents today?

There seem to be plenty of lawyers and lawyers, too. It is officially declared that the law comes first but few people turn to lawyers, mostly out of need. They know perfectly well that these are tiny thieves. They, like everyone else, only need customers. It is better to find a relative, an acquaintance in power and solve all the problems. Informal laws — once again — decide here everything.

What am I talking about? What are these parallels for?

First of all, these parallels are necessary to understand why the Khazars failed in the early Middle Ages. It seems that Judaism was adopted — the first religion of monotheism, not even Christianity or Islam, but the Khazar Khaganate collapsed (moreover, the Khazars disappeared as a people). Aren’t we in danger of the same thing? What can we do? The basic ideology is not to be trifled with. Religion (idea) must be appropriate to the circumstances. The people should understand what they believe in or should believe in any case. (Back in 1993, as a student in Alma-Ata (new name is Almaty, immediately after the collapse of the USSR in 1991), taking groceries from the balcony, I was surprised at how quiet it was on the street on November 7. But before, what demonstrations there were! It was worth the new authorities to cancel the proletarian holiday — so significant, so important two years ago, and everything went quiet …).

With democracy comes market relations — everyone knows that.

But market relations can come without democracy, as it turned out. It is enough only to designate democracy — to talk about it, broadcast from all official channels, from the pages of newspapers, to mention in speeches authorized speakers, primarily top officials of the state and those close to power (again relatives, acquaintances, obsequious servants). The rest is a trifle. The main thing is to buy everything, it turns out, and sell everything — fill your pockets with money, make an initial accumulation, and then close this shop; «hello, I’m your aunt.» Autocracy is also coming to our bazaar. Any bazaar should also have order and security. The state, after all, protects you, too, and gives you a guarantee. Will everyone believe it? I doubt. Isn’t that why everyone pushing their trolleys in supermarkets is so gloomy, not smiling? It’s like they live in a colony and depend on new robbers.

In the same way, ordinary Khazar nomads looked at their Jewish elite.

They couldn’t figure out what the Jewish mono G-d was, in the first place.

Why do they need one monobog when they have many gods and deities?

Everybody needs an understandable set of images to understand how a local faith arises, which becomes a religion through practice. Only the god Tengri and they knew ancestors’ spirits were clear to the Khazars.

For example, a pagan does not understand why God helps him if he is not his relative. Why would God help everyone? How, on what basis, does he distinguish between his own and others? It is your own, and it is others’ — they understood it well. The «first-second» is not far from this. Am I the first favorite or the second favorite of God? So that this god can distinguish. So that these pagans understand. First, they understood truth and justice outside of the «friend or foe» about blood. For people to get out of the symbolic row of friend and foe, their own and others must be mixed up.

Jews have been wandering in foreign lands for 2000 years. They have perfectly assimilated truth, goodness, equality, and justice in one requirement — common universal citizenship. Nobody can’t be an internationalist in the circle of relatives. To understand it, you need to live in a foreign land. It would be best to migrate anywhere for various reasons (mainly out of need), and there is a demand for equality based on universal values and not by blood. If local people do not understand it (and they cannot comprehend it by definition), migrants arrange or arrange riots and revolutions for them. That’s why Asians don’t understand revolutionaries from the word in any way. Asians are inertial and traditional. All the pastoral peoples were exactly the same in the past. They were driving herds. Not a single sheep could separate from the flock. Not a single person in the tribal collective could claim their new status. There is no choice in a large family. All children try to be loved most, but good parents do not single out favorites.

Chapter 12

Twins

The Khazars’ acceptance of Judaism is most politically motivated. By the 8th century, Khazaria was already an empire. It is simply impossible to keep a wide variety of peoples, especially tribes, in a solidary union. A particular «friendship» belonging to the same government had to be supported by ideology. Obviously, they did not know about ideology at that time, but they perfectly understood the meaning of religion. In this sense, the choice of Judaism as the oldest Abrahamic branch is quite logical.

But why Judaism? That’s where you can and should look not for politics, but also a nomadic character (preserved in its pure form as «first -second» until today?

Is it pride?

Yes, that’s right. It is «Am I the first or the second?»

The nomads will never be second. They still live by the principle no one can be first but me.

The adoption of Christianity or Islam by the Khazars would immediately place them in subordination, in a position of secondary importance. (It would seem that people with a tribal matrix should have a democratic mood of indifference. It only seems so. There is no democracy. All the Zerefs of the world have one democracy — the military one. That is, one-time, during the election of warriors. Then, the entire population lines up in squads and listens to every word of the leader. Doesn’t this remind you of our modern autocracy? Everyone is just talking about democracy. Everyone talks about democracy just for show. Because the US hegemony over the whole world is also military, by the way. However, the USA has a completely different democracy. If international bankers decide to scare the whole world with aircraft carriers and coups, they know who they are dealing with — they have long studied the psychology of colonial peoples. Refags have the most extensive experience, resulting in the highest practical reflection. They know perfectly well who and how to talk to. Hence the policy of double standards).

So.

Although everyone sees a political motive in the adoption of Judaism — the Khazar kings chose the religion of monotheism in the name of the empire, we should immediately notice in this choice the proud pose of the nomads «first — second.»

Then, in the eternal nomad movement itself, there is no condition for Asian despotism. There is eternal, unlimited spatial freedom in nomadism. There is a dictatorship of the clan leader, but all tribesmen know that this is power in the name of the clan («in the name of the family»), and not so that everyone survives the campaign in the name of the sons of the nobility. A developed economy and some profit are required to allocate the leader’s sons as heirs. And what is the profit of the wild nomads of the past? All nomads just wanted to survive in the harsh environment.

For Asian despotism to arise, all shepherds must stop and settle on the ground. Then, hierarchical relations will remember everything and write it down in books. Just by the end of the 8th century, the main population of Khazaria was called sedentary. Since the Khazars were given the name of the Khaganate, this already speaks of settlement and hierarchy.

Were Jews shepherds?

You bet! Some were shepherds more than others. However, farmers were next to the Khazars for a very long time. (If you don’t remember the Greek cities of Crimea, click here.) In the Bible, exemplary community members are compared to sheep all the time, not exemplary ones with goats; it is the proof.

However, wherever the Kagals appeared, not immediately, but over time, friction with the local population began. Because the Jews behaved suspiciously in the eyes of these people, they gathered all the time on Saturdays in synagogues and observed their rituals. The Jews showed no desire to merge with the Aborigines. Before the case of the Khazars, Jews did not settle among the nomads in any way. That’s why they were chased everywhere. And when they came to the Khazars, they stayed there. Moreover, they passed on their faith to them. Why?

But because they talked to the nomads in the same invisible language. Although Jews did not roam like their ancestors used to, they only migrated for objective reasons, if the persecution of Jews can be called something else — forced migrants. And weren’t the Khazar nomads driven by nature in the same way? People persecuted Jews, and Khazars were forced to roam by nature: people are also nature. That’s the difference. So much for the similarity. What should we call this invisible language, or rather the aura of freedom, that told the Jews where they would be better off and where they would not be (where they would have to fight all the time for equality, for citizenship, for socialism, finally)?

It turns out that the Khazars are the first of the nomads to master commodity-money relations, and the Jews are freedom fighters. The Khazars, however, lagged far behind; so far, they have been opposed only by nature and the weather. To overcome all adversities and survive, they had to wander, wander, and «keep warm.»

The Jews were far ahead of others. They found a radical way against nature as if they were against wild pagan peoples. However, nations are unpredictable, unlike nature — they persecuted Jews out of jealousy, suspicion, and envy. The Jews also gave them money «on loan,» «but they did not give it to their Jews» — as bequeathed by G-d. This was very similar to the fact that all pagan nomads sacrificed Tengri. This often did not help them.

P.S.

No one knew then that future nomads would love commodity-money relations, so it is unnecessary to accept Judaism for this. The main thing is to love freedom in the form of the principle «Am I first or second?» because money and wealth greatly raise everyone in the eyes of others. The main thing here is to be an elite. Or call yourself an elite with the help of journalists, propagandists, and other modern servants. This causes obvious nomadic unscrupulousness and unbridled corruption).

Chapter 13

The instinct of power. Chosenness

Children can also wear adult clothes. When very young children imitate adults, it’s a whole performance. This does not cause anything but approval.

Addicts can take drugs. But the «junkies» charge money for the next dose.

«First — second» is, of course, the instinct of the importance of being chosen. God chose the Jews — everyone knows about it. But what about the nomads?

Nomads, the nomadic elite, are always in a state of Brownian conceit. I and only I, although such leadership is certainly not as conscious as that of King Louis 14 of France in the form of «the state is me.» The instinct of leadership is not in every person’s blood, but every nomad has it. (The nomad’s love of power is literally painted on his face. If the nomad’s ambitions are not satisfied, he will also try not to obey. Although you can’t find fault with him outwardly, he will also do everything: perform and show friendship and diligence. But who is the fool who would believe in this diligence and friendship? At the same time, an unsatisfied, power-hungry Kazakh will sit up to anyone, even his relative or even his own son. It’s all a fight. It’s between our own. The intraspecific struggle is stronger than the interspecific one. Every family has its despot. So we can be trusted by others).

In an animal pack, no one also believes that he is a state, that someone consciously obeys someone, because animals do not have a state, but have their own organization — a pack and instincts: animals behave almost like humans (this «almost» is never overcome in animals. They will never become people).

This step between the pack and the chosen one «from G-d» is occupied by everyone at a particular stage of civilizational childhood.

Yes, the instinct of power is in a person’s blood, and it cannot be taken away. Therefore, although the choice of one of the Abrahamic branches, and the oldest one, looks like a political choice, nevertheless, this most radical instinct influenced the motive of this choice. Am I the first or the second? This is not «I want to be second» to the Khazars, as the most obvious representatives of the nomadic world, turned into we do not want to be second after Christians and Muslims. Among the pagans, the military leader decides everything. Everything he does is repeated by everyone else in the caravan. The same can also be expressed with such a motto — we are independent! If anything, we’ll ride off to the steppe and separate from you. We will create a new Horde (which means we will create a new independent state).

No one knows the reason for such a degree of pride in such a world yet. Nobody doesn’t want to get into the depths of the subconscious. But we’ll probably have to do it anyway. Besides, it will also reveal the reason for the radical nationalism of all peoples at a certain stage. All civilized nations passed this stage at the end of the 19th and 20th centuries. As for us, who live on the outskirts of civilization «in Asia,» we need to figure this out — for our own good. If we don’t do this, «we will be crushed,» as the leader of all athletes in the USSR said — Stalin. We will turn out to be the same Khazars that we strongly resemble, although the Khazars’ experience would benefit us even after a thousand years. So let’s not waste time.

So, all scientists conclude that Judaism was chosen not to become dependent on Constantinople and Baghdad. It meant a secondary position. Well, how do you put up with it?

We looked at a completely different side of the same choice.

The nature of the nomads dictated independence from Baghdad and Constantinople. That nomads are lonely steppe knights (though represented by the whole horde, because of the speechlessness of ordinary nomads at such moments. All Asians, including Kazakhs, have extreme patience and are silent. But Kazakhs, unlike others, are also power-hungry — they like to command and want to take all sorts of administrative positions. They give the children the names Akim, Sultan, or the names have the ending «khan»: Nursultan, Abylkhan, etc. The whole of Transoxiana was subordinated to the descendants of the nomads for almost 2000 years)